• huginn@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    181
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    1 month ago

    Another demonstration of how NYC is the only real city in America and anywhere else is a suburb larping as a metropolis.

    You can’t call yourself a metropolis unless half the population uses public transit: change my view.

    • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 month ago

      50% of Boston’s workforce commutes using the T every day, but it doesn’t show up on the map. I’m assuming because most of those stops are in outlying towns and, therefore, only make up a minority of the commuting workforce in each area. According to the federal government, the T is the third best public transit system in the US due to it being the fastest average commute out of any by at least half an hour, only outclassed by the quality of DC and Seattle (I believe, might be Portland that’s #1? I’d have to look again).

      • doctortran@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        That’s just an example of how useless the map is. You can’t look at it at this scale and only pay attention to the top most used transportation from a county level. New York City shows up because it literally is those counties, geographically, nearly edge to edge.

    • EABOD25@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Ok! As per the marriam-webster definition of a metropolis:

      the chief or capital city of a country, state, or region,

      the city or state of origin of a colony (as of ancient Greece),

      a city regarded as a center of a specified activity,

      a large important city.

      As per Cambridge:

      a very large city, often the most important city in a large area or country.

      Collins:

      A metropolis is the largest, busiest, and most important city in a country or region.

      Britannica:

      a very large or important city — usually singular

      Oxford:

      A very large urban settlement usually with accompanying suburbs. No precise parameters of size or population density have been established. The structural, functional, and hierarchical evolution of global metropolises is rooted as much in the past as in the present: modern information and communications technology may be more advanced than the 19th-century telegraph, but the processes and outcomes are much the same (Daniels (2002) PHG 26). ‘[Berlin’s] wealth of facilities, as well as their scatter across the metropolis, can be understood only in the light of the city’s history and, paradoxically, its troubles.

      Longman:

      a very large city that is the most important city in a country or area

      You:

      NYC but only if half the people use public transit

      • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        1 month ago

        I don’t think they were being literal or looking for a dictionary definition. I think they were saying the definition of a real city should hinge on the use of mass transit.

        Personally I think anywhere that’s car dependent isn’t somewhere I’d want to live.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 month ago

          I think of it more as transit is a characteristic of a functioning city. You can’t scale well without it.

      • kinsnik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        not OP, but according to some of those definitions (cambridge, collins, longman), NYC would be the only metropolis in the US, as it is the US’ largest, busiest, and most important city.

        • EABOD25@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          It goes by region. LA, San Diego, Chicago, Sacramento, San Francisco, Milwaukee, Detroit, Charlotte, Tulsa, San Antonio, Dallas, Atlanta, Cleveland, Las Vegas, Denver, etc… all fall under the definitions of a metropolis. And the most important city in US is not NYC, it’s Washington DC. NYC is just the most populated and industrialized, DC trump’s it in significance because that’s the epicenter of trade, labor, and industry policies

      • huginn@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Nah buddy I grew up in Atlanta you can’t convince me it’s a metropolis.

        There’s a nice little downtown core and then 99% suburban sprawl. Fuck that

      • FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        All those definitions use “city”. Does the definition of city require the kind of density that would make relying mostly on self-owned cars impossible? Depends, in america no, in other countries maybe.

        • Ledivin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Does the definition of city require the kind of density that would make relying mostly on self-owned cars impossible?

          Ooooo, self-moving goalposts, nice!

        • dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          No. “City” is a legal designation for an inhabited area. Some legal frameworks place a minimum population requirement for designation as a city but none (AFAIK) require a population density value.

          For example, Oklahoma City is the largest city in the US by land area (or it was a few years ago) because the city limits were drawn that way. Population density was and is very low but it’s still a city.

          • FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            in some countries it is. Not in all. You can’t generalise the US’s rules for everywhere. Also, many words have both common and legal meanings.

        • EABOD25@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          No it doesn’t. However original commenter put a challenge out on what a metropolis is. I responded to the challenge.

    • lemming934@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      In Amsterdam the mode share for all trips is like 30% for biking and for walking and like 20% for driving and for transit

      • huginn@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        I was being hyperbolic in my comments anyway. My commute is basically always by bike unless there’s a thunderstorm.

        I know the Brooklyn Bridge has lightning rods but the idea of being on the bridge on an e-bike in a lightning storm, 60 meters in the air is too much.

    • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      change my view.

      Me and the Sullivan twins would like to have a conversation with you and a few baseball bats in the alley out back if you’re seriously arguing that Boston isn’t a metropolis… and don’t you dare fucking insult the Red Sox, Dunkin’ or the Bruins (actually, we care more if you bad mouth our college hockey teams) unless you’d like to qualify for Medicare early.

      • huginn@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Nah I’m not saying NYC is the best city ever - there are so many great cities on earth.

        But there isn’t another metropolis like it in the USA. Is the only true metropolis in America.

    • pressanykeynow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Why isn’t public transport popular in the US? It’s cheaper, it’s cleaner, it saves time, it’s overall better if done right.

    • humble peat digger@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      What are u people smoking, cars are awesome.

      NYC metro is bankrupt and unmaintained. They can’t even build a link to JFK.

      • Ashelyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        Driving is more fun when there are more viable alternatives. I don’t like driving, but it’s my only real choice where I live so I do it begrudgingly, and you have to share the road with me. Think of all the people who don’t want to drive (on account of it being dangerous, costly and/or mentally taxing) suddenly not being in cars, and how much traffic that would free up for you to zip around instead!

        Also, calling a public service “bankrupt” is really weird to me. How many tax dollars are we spending on public highways and freeways again? Do suburbs, which are designed to be car-dependent, provide a net gain or net cost in tax revenue to cities?

      • huginn@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        The state should give the city the metro instead of raiding it to save ski resorts upstate.

        Also you should either block this community yourself or be banned for it. Fuck off car shill.

        • humble peat digger@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          I don’t see the rule that says I’m not allowed to disagree with this channel.
          In fact your rhetoric violates rule 1 and 3.