• Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    4 months ago

    Super Mario 64, and it’s not even close. It’s like asking “Would you rather have some really good mashed potatoes, or a million dollars?”

  • demesisx@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Weird question. Mario 64 and it’s not even close. Most game devs agree that Mario 64 is a masterpiece. Bonus points for being on a platform that had just launched in a completely new paradigm.

    • otp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Less experimental? The N64 controller has 3 prongs (for our 2 hands) because they wanted a backup plan if the whole 3D gimmick never took off! Lol

    • yeehaw
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      “solid controls” - shakes fist at camera angles

    • BlueSquid0741@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      People have different tastes so to some people Nights is a better game.

      I don’t want Mario and I don’t want 3D platformers. I don’t think Nights is a great game but I’ll give it 5 minutes at least.

  • MrJameGumb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I’m going to say Mario 64 just because it was a really good game that I enjoyed back in 96 and I’ve never heard of Nights Into Dreams until this post right now lol

    Edit: after looking up the game I’m going to say a LOT of people probably don’t know Night Into Dreams because it was released for Sega Saturn and not that many people actually bought that system at the time.

  • samus12345@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 months ago

    You’re going to have a hard time making the case that ANY other game that released in 1996 was better than Mario 64.

  • _NetNomad@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    for me, NiGHTS 100%. SM64 is good but was definitely feeling the growing pains of 3D gameplay, whereas NiGHTS was the cumulation of all of the 2D gaming that came before it while also utilizing the new technology available to it’s fullest. as an arcade score-attack style game it also has near infinife replayability, and the soundtrack is one of if not the best of all time. i guess it’s kind of apples to oranges, though- farer to compare two arcade style games like NiGHTS and Star Fox 64 or two 3D platformers like Super Mario 64 and Burning Rangers

    suprised to see how many commenters here haven’t even heard of NiGHTS. a remake of the original game is dirt cheap on Steam and definitely worth taking for a whirl. it is a truly amazing game

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 months ago

    I own Nights into Dreams and Christmas Nights and, frankly, I never understood the point of either of them.

    • psivchaz@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      I was a Sega kid in the Genesis generation. A friend of mine got a Saturn and I so desperately wanted to like Nights because it was the thing for Saturn. I didn’t like it at all. It felt hard to control, hard to understand, and was just not pleasant for me.

      Meanwhile, a different friend and I had a blast trading off playing Mario 64. Hands down, way better for a 9 year old me.

  • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Having been alive when both games were released I can say without any uncertainty Nights into Dreams had more hype around it but Mario 64 definitely was the one that has the legacy.

    Edit when I went to Walmart with my mom and rushed to the electronics section to play video games the nights display usually had a crowd compared to mario64. But the mario64 display stayed up much much much longer.

  • directive0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    Wow. What a question. Its hard for me not to be dismissive.

    I’m going to have to go with Mario 64 by a country mile.

    Appreciate the thought experiment though.

  • cum@lemmy.cafe
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    Mario 64 not even close lol. What made you think Nights was nearly as popular?

  • otp@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    SM64 was definitely more influential in the gaming industry. I haven’t actually played Nights into Dreams, so I can’t speak to its quality, but SM64 sets a high bar. I played it again recently, and still had a ton of fun (despite some frustrations)