• IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    167
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    For the shoplifting thing, it depends which store it is. Big chain grocery store? Yeah, I couldn’t care less what someone takes. Small single owner shop? Fuck you for stealing from that guy. Those stores struggle enough just trying to compete with the Walmarts of the world.

        • Rekorse@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          People who shoplift are only considering a single factor: what’s the likelihood this store ends up caring and puts me in jail eventually.

          Turns out, plenty of stores will NEVER stop you provided you dont exceed a certain dollar amount or try to walk off with large appliances.

          Its not hard to find a stores policy around theft and prevention.

          Its a coincidence that big box stores are stolen from more, not a moral thing.

      • vithigar
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        39
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        When the food is multiple grocery bags full of steaks I’m a little less inclined to a charitable view.

        That said, I’m still not going to do anything about it. Intervening on the behalf of a grocery store is insane, even if I were opposed to what’s happening. Not my monkeys, not my circus.

        • Rediphile
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          I also don’t do anything to be clear. But I do get annoyed when people steal more than they could consume clearly to resell it for profit… because that expense is passed along to paying customers who actually pay for their steaks.

          Like, there isn’t a chance in fucking hell the major grocery chain is just taking that loss right? So they will ensure profits remain high, regardless of the rate of shoplifting taking place. So my steak costs go up.

          But I’ll take that to being a snitch any day. Just trying to provide a more balanced outlook as to why paying consumers might get upset when they see a shoplifter at the store they pay for stuff at. Because it actually does impact them in some way.

        • ScrotusMaximus@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          Riffraff! Street rat! I don’t buy that! If only they’d look closer… Would they see a poor boy? No, siree They’d find out there’s so much more to me

    • ThirdWorldOrder@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 month ago

      Wal mart is still the one and only store I used to steal from back in 90’s. Had to wear umbro shorts since they had that webbing in them and then grab a few CDs and beads to make necklaces that I would sell. By the time I got to high school I was over the shop lifting thing.

      • samus12345@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Much like pirating Nintendo games, it is morally correct to shoplift from Walmart, assuming you have the skill to get away with it.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          Most stores don’t stop you. The security guards are just there for the police report and a description. That said, if you get recognized coming back to the same store, they will call the cops.

          • samus12345@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 month ago

            If there’s a police report, you didn’t get away with it unless you’re never going to that store again. Which is probably not usually the case.

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      In many cities in the US, not only is it illegal, they will charge you with DUI if you appear at all intoxicated, and the keys to the car were at all available to you. Available in this case can mean that you were in the back seat sleeping and the keys were in the front console, or one of the front seats. Don’t even think about running your car to stay warm/cool.

      • Aggravationstation@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 month ago

        Is that whole sobriety test thing real in the US? Like, stand on one leg and recite the alphabet etc? I’ve seen it on TV but always thought it was pretty stupid. In the UK the police have breath-tested for drink driving since 1967.

        • realbadat@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Depends. Smaller townships without regular access to a breathalyzer, yes. Or cops trying to get you to admit that you are intoxicated.

          I walked a straight line while touching my nose because the cop smelled alcohol in the car (rightly so, my wife, then gf, was smashed). Took about 10 seconds for him to go “So obviously that’s all her, have a good night!”.

          So yes, it does happen.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 month ago

          Oh they do both. And you can get what they call a DWI (Driving While Impaired) just on the basis of the circus act in some states. So the breath test comes back at say, .037, which is well within the legal limit. The cop can charge you with DWI anyways based on your bad balance.

          • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            Forget the bad balance. All the cop has to put in his report is the language they were taught. The suspect had red, glassy eyes when I approached. They might as well drag and drop these statements or just have them written by LLM.

        • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          It’s real, and it’s totally based on the officer’s gut feelings. Hell breathalyzers over analyze over 70% of the time. The entirety of the war on drugs and the tools to combat drunk driving are not entirely based in science

          • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 month ago

            tools to combat drunk driving are not entirely based in science

            To the point that the accuracy of breathalyzers has been challenged so many times in CA that it’s to the point that if the cops in CA have you breathe into a machine and that machine returns a number that would constitute a DUI if that were your BAC then it’s a DUI, regardless of what the machine actually does or whether the number in question is actually connected to your real BAC in any way.

        • Gigasser@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          It’s all really just an excuse by the popo to book you. Which is why you should always ask for the breathalyzer if you really weren’t drinking.

        • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 month ago

          it’s real, and it does work pretty well.

          We also do the breathalyzer, or blood draws, but those are a little more involved, and if you can’t do a field sobriety test then you definitely as hell can’t drive a fucking car lmao.

            • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              you think those people are required to do them? One of the primary tests doesn’t even require you to move. 50% of the other two are literally counting.

              And like i said, you can just hit them with the blow test? Or blood like i mentioned, that’s a particularly good one.

              • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                In some states refusing the circus act is an automatic DUI. Even if you ask for a blood test. We have the technology to just do away with it. And dyslexic people can drive just fine while fucking up the numbers and alphabet. It just needs to go.

                • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  that is pretty silly, though idk much about the specifics of it, really it should only mean you get arrested/detained, it shouldn’t be possible to charge you with something that isnt proven.

                • crispy_kilt@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  There are no we-passionately-hate-poor-and-or-homeless-persons-and-want-to-make-them-suffer-as-much-as-we-can laws in the spirit of that culture of the USA, no

                  In the civilised world, there are laws to the opposite, in fact.

                  In Switzerland, access to lakes and rivers is guaranteed by law, for everyone (even poor people! Imagine that) even, and especially, if that means walking on land owned by someone else, private or not.

                  In Sweden, people can even roam the entire country freely, by law.

                • Almrond@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  In the US it isn’t even usually trespassing, it is specifically illegal to sleep in your car, even on public property.

  • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    1 month ago

    i genuinely can’t believe there are laws around sleeping in vehicles these days. You want me to pack up and fuck off after a day? Fine, i’ll do that, i can live with that. Fuck you for making it illegal though. Actual bullshit.

  • GloriousGouda@lemmy.myserv.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    I remember being told that an adult could sleep in a car, but with a child, sleeping in a car is considered “endangerment”. Doubly so if you’re a CIS gender male with a female child. This was a Texas CPS social worker. We just had a flood and were brainstorming ideas for temporary shelter for folks.

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Totally!.. At the home Depot if someone shoplifts a drill, tell them where the drill bits are. Chances are they won’t be able to come back to home Depot again for a while. They might as well have all they need.

  • antidote101@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Why not buy some under water drills and an underwater propulsion device then go down to the marina and sink some expensive yatchs? How about slashing some police tires?

    Why not study an industry you wanna take down and figure out how? Or gather an online flash mob and invade a conservative website or institution. How about running for office at your local council? Or sending letters to good and bad politicians saying what you think. Contact the media about something you believe but make sure it’s the right level for what you’re saying.

    Or go read some leftwing theory.

    • Cowbee@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Some of that is adventurism, so I would say organizing comes first. Sinking yachts does little without a mass leftist movement to take advantage of the damage.

      Theory is great too, it makes your practice sharper.

  • buzz86us@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    And we pay to keep them homeless between shit charities with stocked boards making $100k yearly, ER visits, and arrests/enforcement… This system of capitalism is totally ducked build dense affordable housing, and watch America become actually great again.

  • cumskin_genocide@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I never snitch, ever. If my neighbour was a serial killer, I’d just move instead of calling the cops.

  • cordlesslamp@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    I know people who are shoplifting for “fun” or for “the thrill”. They don’t even care about the items and they definitely don’t care about the shop owner. They just do it when they see the chances.

    • flora_explora@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      But who are we to judge when shoplifting is appropriate or not? Also, if you are shoplifting to spite the capitalist system, you are doing society a favor. If you are shoplifting in a small self-owned store that is struggling itself, this would be less than ideal. But all other large corporate-owned shops are ethically OK to shoplift imo.

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        But who are we to judge when shoplifting is appropriate or not?

        Seems like that’s the whole post.

    • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      Gas Station Encounters is a great channel to see shoplifters in action.

      Pays 100$ for gas, 50$ worth of scratch tickets, 20$ worth of soda

      Steals a 50¢ candy bar

      Some people are just… lmao

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I sleep outside just because sometimes. So anyways homeless people don’t exist right?

  • EmperorHenry@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    I guess it depends on what you’re shoplifting and who you’re stealing from.

    Like, stealing a gaming rig from a mom-and-pop style PC building/repair shop wouldn’t be okay

    • el_abuelo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      To me, shop lifting is taking small value items.

      What you described is, to me, theft.

      IANAL

  • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    Here’s the deal: as long as you’re not being an asshole about doing any of these things, I’ll probably overlook it.

    Start acting a fool however, and I’ll have the cops come collect you.

  • Jay
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’m just a tool of my own design.