• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    While this accident would likely have severely damaged any vehicle, the sardine-can-style peeling of bodywork on the Cybertruck may be due to its unique construction. Whereas a standard body panel would have likely crumpled and deformed, the Cybertruck’s rigid stainless steel material likely wasn’t able to, and was instead ripped off the vehicle.

    Aren’t “crumple zones” a thing cars are supposed to have?

    • MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Only weak pansy cars have crumple zones. Back in my day, the cars were built stronger. You could run over a cat and barely feel it. Head on collision? I could drive away from those, provided the engine block didn’t end up in the passenger space. These modern cars just give up and die, and the mandatory seat belts just trap you inside instead of being safely thrown clear of the vehicle. AMERICAN STEEL! LEADED GASOLINE! I YEARN FOR THE GOOD OL DAYS!

      • sudo42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        “Seat belts in cars? Nah, they just hosed out the interior and sold it to someone else!” — Jay Leno about cars in the old days

      • ChowJeeBai@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        6 months ago

        Crumple zones absorb energy of a collision. Our new detachable body panels disperse it. Damn the pedestrians.

        • manufacturers copy
    • barsquid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 months ago

      Maybe if you are merely an auto manufacturer with decades of experience you make cars a bit beneath the standards of a manchild emerald mine beneficiary pretending to be a tech genius.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Looks pretty crumpled and deformed to me. Are we sure the skin is not a crumple zone

  • glimse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    6 months ago

    Ok so I’m not saying it looks GOOD but…wow, this car is so much less ugly in black.

    I have even less respect for people who buy the plain silver knowing this is an option.

    • aodhsishaj@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      That’s likely a wrap as there’s no paint on offer from Tesla and a clear vinyl wrap is available for I think 3k. This black wrap was likely done at a third party shop. Probably cost around a 300 to a grand depending.

    • barsquid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      I played a lot of N64 so the aesthetic is nostalgic. Unfortunately for Tesla, I don’t have enough money to buy a video game accessory at their price. For what they’re asking I’d need it to be an actual vehicle with the capability to survive a light rain.

      • glimse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        What about the aesthetic reminds you of N64? If it was light gray I’d definitely agree but it just looks industrial to me.

        • barsquid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          Just that low poly nature of it. Makes me recall a time when the main character triangle counts were just in the double digits.

          • glimse@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 months ago

            Ah fair enough, it does indeed look like it belongs in Mario 64 or something. I was only picturing the console itself for some reason

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 months ago

    That side window not even cracked tho.

    But seriously, a huge point these articles never seem to include is whether the photo is before or after rescuers pried it apart to get the people out. I’ve been fooled before by horrible accident damage that was just “jaws of life”

    • barsquid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yeah I don’t see the “can of sardines” shit in the ditch photo. But why are these things stuck in mud and wet sand so often, I thought they were intended to go outdoors for camping? And it doesn’t look like it was rolled, so why would rescuers need to use the jaws in the first place?

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        It’s a funny image to think of, isn’t it? Needs jaws of life because stuck in mud?

    • Thorry84@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I don’t really get why someone would link to a shitty site like that, when the entire source is a single tweet. Just link to the tweet.

      Or better yet, don’t link to anything related to Musk and ignore him. The only reason Musk has gotten away with all his lies and bullshit is because everything he does gets shared around like it’s a big deal. Enough fucking Musk spam already.