• jaeme@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Speaking at the paper’s launch, Bridenstine believed it was important to create communication channels, noting that Nasa was not allowed to directly engage with its Chinese counterpart without congressional approval.

    Critical support for the US govt. ostracizing itself for sinophobic and anti-communist attitudes held by geriatric white supremacists and genocide enjoyers.

    The US should be banned from the international space field. All they think about is colonization and atrocity. China is much better suited for coordinating space expeditions with other nations.

      • jaeme@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        11 months ago

        I don’t know if this is suppossed to be a meta-commentary/joke or not. I never said both of those things.

        China is more suited for space coordination because of its productive capacity and cooperation with other nations. China will not seek to “own” outer space but to instead integrate space travel as a way to benefit itself and the world. China can care for its citizens, the US is quickly losing the ability/will to do so.

        Why not try to reflect on the fact that the US only cares about space travel when China seems to overtake them ever so slightly?

        I don’t care what you really feel about China, but to interpret my support for China leading the space field as ignorance is just projection.

          • intelshill
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Is China shipping billions of dollars in weapons to Israel as they, in 3 months, have dwarfed Ukrainian civilian casualties over 2 years? No? Well…

            Did China instigate a coup of Pakistan’s democratically-elected leader? No?

            Is China the only country voting against the Right to Food pursuant to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (Article 25)? No?

            Hm.

            • drktrts
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Oh look! Whataboutisms! Even when called out directly… It’s laughable

              Just for posterity’s sake, my previous comment

              • intelshill
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                Your claim is that China is just as ill-intentioned. It’s not whataboutism to point out how that statement is wrong, because you brought that statement up yourself.

                • drktrts
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  It is, because China also has many things we can point to, which you don’t even mention. I already acknowledged the US’s imperialist actions, there was no need to elaborate on it, that isn’t disproving me. If you were discussing in good faith, there would be no need to further elaborate on an agreed fact. The burden is on you to prove to me that China is not like that.

                  • intelshill
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    You made the claim, the burden of proof is on you. It’s a bit harder because I’ve already provided counterarguments, but here’s another one for good measure:

                    There are 25000 mosques in Xinjiang, one for every 500 Muslims. In comparison, there are 3000 mosques in the entire US.

            • drktrts
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              That’s just terribly false. All we have to do is spend 10 minutes looking at China’s official statements towards some of their active international intentions to see proof otherwise. This comment will likely be deleted because it doesn’t follow your narrative (just like my previous), but your statements aren’t convincing anyone.

            • NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              11 months ago

              Are these the same global south countries that China is building things at prices they know they can’t pay back so that they can seize them later or the China that is currently trying to take over huge parts of the ocean that belong to others under international law?

        • WraithGear@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          11 months ago

          Can we apply this methodology of Chinas in how they treat their neighbors, and “wont seek to “own” outer-space” and do so at the benefit of the world and compare it to how they treat Taiwan, Hong Kong, and international waters? Oh to shreds you say?

          • intelshill
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            No one in the region considers the South China Sea to be international waters.

            Everyone just disputes who’s waters they should be. Don’t talk about things you know nothing about.

              • intelshill
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                It’s the same concept where not even Taiwan claims they’re a sovereign and independent state: they’re the rightful government of all of China (including Mongolia).

        • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          11 months ago

          China will not seek to “own” outer space

          Let’s see China get out of other nations’ ocean space first and then we can talk about outer space.