@[email protected] to [email protected] • 2 years agoAnother proof: Signal is privacy friendly.signal.orgmessage-square22fedilinkarrow-up118arrow-down114
arrow-up14arrow-down1external-linkAnother proof: Signal is privacy friendly.signal.org@[email protected] to [email protected] • 2 years agomessage-square22fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•2 years agoI think I did. I might have not understood it. However, is that response enough? Shouldn’t Signal have some kind of audit by authorities to confirm it is true what they responded?
minus-squareJedraxlinkfedilink1•2 years agoSignal is open source, so the authorities can just check their code and see that they don’t have any of this information.
minus-squareJedraxlinkfedilink1•2 years agoSorry yeah, deleted it right away, not sure how you were able to see it.
minus-squareKinetixlink1•2 years agoMagic! Heh… Come see https://lemmy.ca/post/15834 it looks like there’s still some interesting federation bugs, as your comment still resides here undeleted.
I think I did. I might have not understood it. However, is that response enough? Shouldn’t Signal have some kind of audit by authorities to confirm it is true what they responded?
Signal is open source, so the authorities can just check their code and see that they don’t have any of this information.
Not all of it any longer.
Sorry yeah, deleted it right away, not sure how you were able to see it.
Magic!
Heh… Come see https://lemmy.ca/post/15834 it looks like there’s still some interesting federation bugs, as your comment still resides here undeleted.
deleted by creator
Ahh good to know! Thanks
Ahh good to know! Thanks