• IninewCrow
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Maybe this is how the bible was written, rewritten and evolved over time.

    It just started out as some young obnoxious guy with a lute making mad music in ancient Mesopotamia. Everyone panned his music, then after he died, someone translated it to a new language, a few hundred years go by and it got translated again, then a few hundred years went by and it got translated again and after the fourth translation, we end up with the first book of Genesis.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 days ago

      Hmmmmmm, well that certainly tracks with human behavior. Kind of like how there was a meme that the earth was flat. Nobody actually BELIEVED it. It was just a funny joke to explain why sailors would come in, and then sail off, and you’d never see that sailor again.

      So, ha ha, funny meme, earth is flat.

      Then hundreds of years later, people discovered that people “used to believe the earth was flat”. Wow. What stupid people those guys were hundreds of years ago, huh?

      Then it gets discovered nobody ACTUALLY believed that…but they do NOW. You know. Currently. AFTER we’ve been to space, and photographed the planet while not currently being on said planet. Only AFTER space travel did people revisit the earth being flat, and seriously unironically believe that.

      So I can’t believe ANY of the bullshit IN the bible. But I can totally believe it began as a meme, got out of control, and now it’s just “fact” to some people.

      …and by “some people” I mean gullible morons.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        6 days ago

        You say that as if there wasn’t plenty of time before 100 BC for the stories to evolve.

        • zirconium886@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 days ago

          Or that translations that are still in circulation don’t translate the original manuscripts (cough cough KJV)

          • IninewCrow
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 days ago

            Or come up with a new version (cough cough Koran)

        • Isoprenoid@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          I wonder if those stories even matter, like they are from a culture so far removed from us (over 2 thousand years) that the lessons probably shouldn’t be hard interpreted.

          We wouldn’t like people to have differing opinions about stuff? Everyone should believe what we believe, think what we think. /s

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            I have no idea what point you’re trying to make, or what I wrote to provoke your angry tone.

            All I’m saying is that (for example) if Moses supposedly wrote the first five books of the Bible and he lived circa 1200-1500 BC (as per various estimates mentioned by Wikipedia), but the oldest surviving copy of those books is from 100 BC, that’s 1000+ years of potential change that we have no way of disproving.

            • Isoprenoid@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 days ago

              angry tone.

              Sarcastic tone, you’re reading what I wrote in an angry voice. Try reading with a happy voice. 😉

              that’s 1000+ years of potential change that we have no way of disproving.

              What if that’s not the point?

              “Oh, but it’s not exactly what that person said!”

              So what? Taking sentences out of context is bad interpretation anyway, especially if we aren’t reading the original language with the original cultural context (again, which was over 2 thousand years ago).

              You’re arguing for the letter of the law, I’m arguing for the spirit.