I did not ask for definitions, but the ethicality of the journalism process of linked article you questioned in this thread. It does not look questionable at all, so, why did you call it that?
According to current practices, it isn’t unethical. However according to the standards of Scientific journalism, it is just a statement given by 3 people and is a poor source.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_journalism
I did not ask for definitions, but the ethicality of the journalism process of linked article you questioned in this thread. It does not look questionable at all, so, why did you call it that?
According to current practices, it isn’t unethical. However according to the standards of Scientific journalism, it is just a statement given by 3 people and is a poor source.