Stux from geddit.social think that the massive recent wave of ~100k new Lemmy accounts is likely mostly spammers. Captchas suck, but are they better than the alternative?

  • smorksMA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m aware of this already, thought about preemptively blocking those instances, but will probably just wait and see.

    captchas are ok, but probably just a minor deterrant. I think they should be an option though.

    not sure what the best way to stop this though, in the long run.

      • Troy
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        You joke, but I wouldn’t be opposed. Would make it hard to sign up for a non-local instance though.

        But then, I’m also the guy who just spent 11 years on reddit with his real name. So clearly privacy has never been my deciding factor when choosing a social network.

        • lightrush
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          That’s the best approach to leaving footprints on the internet. Especially on social media. Assume everything is public.

      • smorksMA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        hahaha yes! that’ll fix everything!

        • lightrush
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Undoubtedly. 😂

          Joke aside, longer term, we could have a privacy-tiered verification approach. For example SMS verification for automatic approval, or text application for manual review. Some users might be OK giving their phone numbers for this purpose, while others might prefer submitting an essay. 🤷