• LostWon
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    At least in my opinion if we were in a sane world, services like getmaple.ca would absolutely have a role in publicly funded health care. Instead though, the people who could use it the most are probably the least likely to have access. Last I heard, medical services are also a rare area where AI could actually have a positive impact by pre-screening patients before they see professionals.

    • corsicanguppy
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      sane world, services like getmaple.ca would absolutely have a role

      What’s does “slippery slope” mean in your sane world?

      • LostWon
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Unless you’re against public health care, I think you’re misunderstanding me. I was answering the question as asked. Canadians can use remote service options, but they should be billed under the public system rather than privately. I’m talking about getting OFF the two-tier slope we’re already on.

    • cheese_greater@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean, I wouldnt ever really need them for just random stuff I can see my dr for but if there was ever a difficulty in continuity of care which is available, i can see it as a worst case scenario type intervention

      • LostWon
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It doesn’t have to be primary care (though some might need it). Those with access can even talk with specialists without a referral (by voice or video, possibly also text chat), thereby jumping the queue even if it’s just for an initial consultation. It can be useful for second opinions, increasing accessibility for disabled folks, or when someone is out of refills and their doctor is on vacation, among other possible reasons. (The option to send necessary photos or such electronically isn’t currently available at most regular doctors’ offices either, and would be nice to have everywhere.)

        • cheese_greater@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          That should not be a thing. A referral (even for the initial booking) should always have to go through some professional who can nominally tell its even relevant or therapeutically/diagnostically helpful dr = gatekeeper). I feel like thats an important part of a successfull + efficient public healthcare system.

          Ironically, I feel this has to be matched by an increase in patient self-advocacy or awareness of the need to practice it. Drs are so stretched and have so many patients you need to takean active role in learning to listen to your body and mind and being able to intelligently engage with current or potential matters and to express the need for treatment or further evaluation without resistance.

          Stories where people point out it where [I’m inserting a random generally outrageous example) 2 years to get a referral coughed up by their primary are outrageous to me. I simply would never tolerate that. I personally would ask once and get the referral or to set the granting of it in motion administratively speaking.

          If my dr gave me any lip or resistance I would be finding another while I continue to try and get the referral and waiting to file a formal complaint with the college but that would be an extreme point I don’t think we’d ever actually get to). Just keep booking appts and sit and say whatever you need, same like last time. You just might wear them down enough to give you what you need or direct you towards someone who can and is likely willing