• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    728 months ago

    Alt-text OP inexplicably refused to give us:

    Running for office in Minnesota on the single-issue platform ‘dig a permanent channel through the Traverse Gap because it will make this map more satisfying.’

    • OtterOPA
      link
      English
      21
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I deserve this, even promised to remember last time

      • @JoeBigelow
        link
        38 months ago

        I will await you’re return with an upvote in hand

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      10
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Fun fact, that traverse gap separates the red river of the north from the MINNESOTA river - which eventually drains into the Mississippi. The Mississippi starts at Lake Itasca.

      Fun fact #2, the Minnesota/Mississippi drains into the Atlantic via the Gulf, but the red river eventually drains into the Arctic Ocean via the Hudson Bay!

      • FaceDeer
        link
        fedilink
        98 months ago

        Another fun fact; the Red River is very prone to spring flooding because it flows such a great distance north. The headwaters thaw out and start flowing while the river’s outlet is still frozen over. Many cities and towns in Manitoba have dikes around them and turn into islands during the spring flood. Winnipeg has a flood diversion canal to guide the floodwaters past it each spring.

        I think I just ran out of fun facts about Manitoba.

      • Kichae
        link
        fedilink
        3
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Funny, I thought the Red River drained into Fargo.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      38 months ago

      I wonder if they were connected, hypothetically, if the Hudson would drain into the Caribbean or the other way around. The North American plains bisect the entire continent so it’s feasible; I just don’t know if the two bodies of water are at the same elevation, and due to gravitational effects, etc, large bodies of water aren’t always at sea level.

    • Kichae
      link
      fedilink
      8
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Yeah, I’m wounded by the commission omission of Cape Breton. But I think it’s just that there’s nothing dubious about our islands.

      Edit: Sausage fingers and rogue autocorrect.

    • wjrii
      link
      fedilink
      28 months ago

      As a Florida-born Texan of partial Newfoundlander heritage, I’m… sort of nonplussed?

      Agree with the other poster though. Nothing dubious about Newfoundland’s island status.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        28 months ago

        I’d be more concerned if, as a Newfie, you were plussed to begin with!

        Actually I have no idea what that would mean.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    148 months ago

    So what I’m hearing is that Lewis and Clark were idiots and you totally can go from coast to coast in a canoe

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    8
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Chehalis-Blacklake is pretty dubious. It’s a long stretch of wetlands. There is a sign and everything and technically it counts but there’s development and roads going through it without bridges.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    38 months ago

    XKCD is usually more astute. The lack of the Colorado River, and The Grand Canyon, is a glaring omission.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      21
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      “XKCD is usually more astute. The lack of the Colorado River, and The Grand Canyon, is a glaring omission.”

      Does the Colorado cut off a land mass? I don’t think the Colorado even reaches the sea anymore, let alone psuesocleave apart a part of the continent.

      That was a fun last sentence to say.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -18 months ago

        What could possibly cleave the continent more than the Grand Canyon? In many places it’s a barrier that can’t be crossed except by flight.

        It’s a prominent river until Yuma, AZ, which is not too far from the Gulf of California. And even if the water doesn’t always flow, it forms the boundary between the Mexican states of Baja and Sonora.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          38 months ago

          Yes, but you fail to understand the difference between a peninsula and a psuedo-island (a piece of land entirely surrounded by any body of water, artificial or manmade).

          The Colorado River starts in Colorado is does not flow over the continental divide.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            18 months ago

            No river can be traced all the way up to a dividing ridge. As the contributing drainage area gets smaller it will be a stream, then creek, trickle, gulley, and by the time it’s on a mountain ridge it’s nothing.