The Liberal government is looking to cut almost $1 billion from the annual budget of the Department of National Defence — a demand the country’s top military commander says is prompting some “difficult” conversations within the military.

  • MooseGas@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hear me out. Let’s make a few nukes. Sure we cut back on military spending, but if you try anything… nuked. We have the uranium.

    • PugJesus@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago
      1. Nuclear maintenance is very expensive.

      2. Nukes are actually terrible for defense purposes, since starting a nuclear war is a very ‘all or nothing’ affair, which means your choices are reduced to “Armageddon” or “Let the other side have their way” whenever a crisis comes up.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nukes are actually terrible for defense purposes, since starting a nuclear war is a very ‘all or nothing’ affair, which means your choices are reduced to “Armageddon” or “Let the other side have their way” whenever a crisis comes up.

        See: Russia and every final warning it has given over Ukraine. Since the US knows they have nothing conventionally and doesn’t buy that they’re going to end the world over a shipment of helmets or whatever it gets ignored.

      • Rentlar
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Apparently, having nukes grants you the “You just crossed another red line!” defence.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It is pretty good for stopping an outright invasion, though, if that’s your only concern. That’s basically what North Korea does. This is not Canada’s strategic position.

      • AngryMulbear
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nukes are a good deterrent against attacks on civilians. There’s a reason Ukraine hasn’t started lobbing rockets at Russian cities.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean, that’s why proliferation happens. It’s great for the country doing it but brings us all closer to apocalypse.

      In our specific case we’re not North Korea and probably don’t want to piss off the entire rest of the world, though.

    • Kbin_space_program@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Post WW1 we were a global power because we had one of the largest logistics chains of chemical weapons.

      Allegedly that played a role in the Nazis not using chemical weapons on troops, because Canada completely outclassed them on that.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Huh, interesting. Did Canada have an oil industry going already somewhere in the 40’s? Usually that stuff is made in petrochemical facilities.