• masterspace
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Capital flight is often blown up into a bigger issue then it is by conservatives to avoid taxing the wealthy, but it is not a myth. It is a real effect that governments need to take into account when making policy decisions.

    I.e. If it was a myth, we wouldn’t have an exit tax.

    • anachronist@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s a myth that rich people aren’t already avoiding every tax they can. They would have you believe that there are rich people not currently avoiding a 20% tax who would avoid it if it were 40%. In fact they’re already doing everything they can do to avoid it and if they’re paying it at 20% they would still be paying it at 40%.

    • Mavvik
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Its a myth in the sense that it isnt significant except in extreme scenarios (e.g. violent regime change, economic collapse). A modest wealth tax will not make that happen.

      • masterspace
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I mean, it’s different because California is a state and not a country, but they are seeing some capital flight because of their wealth tax. I’m not saying that makes the wealth tax not worth it, I’m just saying that it is a real effect.

        Free trade created the free movement of capital but not the free movement of labour, and capitalists can exploit that.

        • Mavvik
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Has this capital flight resulted in a measurable negative impact to California’s economy?