• Thrillhouse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    That’s not the context though and misrepresents the situation.

    The Speaker of the House invited this guy because he knew of him from his riding. Without doing research or looking further into the circumstances of this individual’s service, the speaker made the decision to recognize this individual.

    This has nothing to do with the PM. It’s the speaker and he resigned.

    It’s pretty disgusting that people try to twist this into a partisan issue so they can dig at the PM. It’s disingenuous and kind of shitty to misrepresent this situation tbh.

    • takeda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m wondering if somebody influenced that speaker. Russian propaganda is now using this that Zelensky (who was present at the time) was clapping when that Nazi was honored.

      • Thrillhouse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Could just be an honest mistake, but it doesn’t mean he shouldn’t be held accountable and I’m glad he has been. If I read the headline correctly I think the PM has also made a formal apology on behalf of the Canadian government as well but someone feel free to correct me on that because I didn’t quite get to reading the article.

        I think the Speaker’s riding is North Bay? The way a lot of small towns / northern cities work is someone tells you “oh I know him he’s a good guy” and you just kind of take it at face value until you find out otherwise.

        Now that’s not the way international protocol should work, obviously, and of course the Russians are going to use it.

        I don’t necessarily believe he was “put up to it” because the simplest explanation is just Northern Ontario word of mouth gone awry and applied to an international diplomatic event where it absolutely should have been fact checked. If I recall correctly, the Speaker said it was a last minute decision.

        I have a contact in the house so I can update if I hear any whisperings. My question is: is the Chief of Protocol responsible for reviewing the Speaker’s remarks. The answer could quite conceivably be no, and if so I think that process should be reviewed.

    • atocci@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh man I didn’t realize he resigned over this. I guess it’s the kind of egg on your face mistake a political career can’t really recover from though…

      • spankinspinach@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s a brutal mistake. As far as speakers go, they’re supposed to be apolitical - putting the decorum and honour of the house above all else - though they’re elected officials. They really shouldn’t be anything of interest ever, it’s literally a protocol role. So this guy… Even IF he was really good at his job as a member of parliament, and well liked among all parties, his career is over

    • Kiosfriend@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      so the conext is that they don’t do some basic research? pretty sure that’s worse than a single one time oopsie.

        • Funderpants
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          In fact it’s the opposite case here, the PM has neither control nor responsibility.

          • charliespider@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            The speaker of the house is the defacto boss of the parliament and that’s who invited the nazi. Even if they knew the history of everyone who enters the building, the PM couldn’t have prevented the speaker from inviting this guy. Had ANYONE known this guy’s history, this wouldn’t have happened.

            • Funderpants
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              This is true, the speaker is by all accounts a professional and well respected man with an impeccable, non partisan service history who made one of the most gigantic individual fuck ups in our patliaments history. If anyone had known beforehand the speaker would not have let him speak.