• countflacula
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Action at the individual level does a great fuck-all when O&G companies are raping our planet for shareholder value at an accelerated rate.

    • yildo@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s the same argument as arguing as Canada doesn’t have to do anything about climate change because China and India can fix it on their own with their bigger population. We have to make some changes on the individual level to be good role models and to pressure those same corporations

    • Pxtl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I disagree with the “blame all the individuals”, but those O&G companies are destroying the planet because they have customers. Somebody buys the gasoline, the fertilizer that becomes cattle-feed, the airline-tickets that consume the fuel.

      If demand dropped, so would their profits.

      • Victor Villas
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        At the same time billions of people live paycheck to paycheck and they can’t afford to vote for the future with their wallets, because they have to vote for their survival right now. Demand pressure is essential but we can’t rely on just that.

        Edit.: Not saying that you’re implying otherwise, I just think it’s important to add that any demand drop will be mild at best in the short term, negligible at worst, and we need to go fast so policy is necessary.

        • Pxtl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Right. I’m not prescribing how the supply should look. Whether it’s a mass deregulation and turning the entire green belt into a trailer park and importing a crapload of mobile homes, or whether we go top-down and start building Khrushchyovkas, or we invent a complicated system of co-ops, or we nationalize every hotel in Canada, whatever strategy that we take: we need a crapload more rental housing, and at least some of it will need to specifically target the most vulnerable because it’s going to take time to properly drive down rents system-wide and there are people for whom this is an emergency.

    • Showroom7561
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Action at the individual level

      Individual x 8.1 billion = significant change.

      Yes, some companies are just awful, but we are supporting them with our lifestyle. Our choices affect their bottom line, and often force them to do better (or worse) depending on how we spend our money.

      • Radicalized@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yeah, the method for those 8.1 bil to organize together to affect meaningful change exists already — it’s called countries passing laws to stop corporations.

          • Victor Villas
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            lol

            a collectivist environmentalist, a practical environmentalist, and someone clueless about pollution and extractivism walk into a bar…