• drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    13 hours ago

    It’s like how Disney makes a big deal about being progressive while making a movie about a space cop who uses her weapons to intimidate indigenous populations.

  • freewheel@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    19 hours ago

    For some of us, the 2016 Democratic primary was quite illuminating. I’m glad to see people are catching up finally.

    • Wolf@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      14 hours ago

      sO yOu ArE sAyInG “bOtH sIDeS eQuAlLy BaD”?!?!?!

      cOnGrAtULaTiOnS oN gEtTiNg TrUmP eLeCtEd!! :(

      • balderdash@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        12 hours ago

        It’s like the second you notice parallels in our two party system, they misrepresent you as saying they are EXACTLY the same in EVERY REGARD.

        Meanwhile, we no longer question why we only have two parties to vote for in the first place. Hint: the two parties keep it that way.

  • aaron@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    It didn’t happen overnight (and racist religious world views have been cultivated within this cohort over many years), but the fact that the poorest most easily manipulated people haven’t had anybody representing their interests for decades now opened the door to Trump.

    The same process is happening in the UK. The UK ‘electorate’ don’t seem to have the wherewithal to see this, instead they often demonise the poor as ‘racist’ or xenophobic inflaming the situation.

    • octopus_ink@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      the poorest most easily manipulated people

      The people who would benefit the most from Democrat-championed social programs that they now label as “radical” and “socialist” you mean?*

       

      *Which is not some blanket endorsement of Democrats. A lot of them are also out of touch, too conservative, and still trying to run the country like it’s 1952. I’m eagerly awaiting the rise of a viable 3rd party (but after all these decades I’m not really holding my breath) or the implosion of the Democrats. I was aghast that Trump somehow pulled them right instead of left, but maybe it will result in an implosion from which Bernie, AOC, Jasmine Crockett and such can bring a phoenix out of the ashes.

      • aaron@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        ‘Radical’ and ‘socialist’ in US politics are not only nothing of the sort but are nowhere near, so no I do not mean that in any sense.

        Don’t put words in my mouth my post was clear.

        • Wolf@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          14 hours ago

          They weren’t putting words in your mouth. They said:

          “The people who would benefit the most from Democrat-championed social programs that they now label as “radical” and “socialist” you mean?”

          They were talking about the poor and working class people who have been convinced by “Conservatives” that those programs are somehow radical and socialist.

          • octopus_ink@slrpnk.netOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Once someone’s reading comprehension gate slams one direction in these conversations it’s hard to get it to flip the other way sometimes. I also tried, but I expect he’ll tell me to fuck off next or something.

            Oh well. Thank you for also trying!

          • aaron@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            14 hours ago

            ‘You mean’

            No I didn’t mean that. Please don’t waste my time.

            • Wolf@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              13 hours ago

              Say what? I thought I understood and supported your original statement, but now I’m not sure.

              Who were you referring to when you said “the poorest most easily manipulated people”?

  • foggianism@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 day ago

    the Dems are in cahoots with the same elite that are in cahoots with the Reps. the dems and reps pretend to be on opposite ends of a spectrum, but they are both sucking up to capitalists and their corporations

      • x0x7@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        What it actually makes them is zionist controlled opposition. You don’t get zionist occupied government without having zionist occupied parties. The US government does whatever is good for Israel even if it is bad for the American people, so yes, we have zionist occupied government.

        So you shouldn’t be surprised that the current in power dems have more loyalty to that than any ideology / policy take. It’s a club and they have to maintain it by controlling who’s in it.

        The guy, unfortunately for him, has a very human and natural position on Gazan genicide. And that’s just not permissible.

        • in4apenny@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Crazy how much people at large have moved past the whole religious zealotry thing, but the people in charge are still having their holy wars and crusades, fulfilling their biblical prophecies and “divine right.” I thought for those in charge this whole religion thing was just a mechanism for power, what’s crazy to me is it actually looks like they believe that shit.

    • x0x7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      15 hours ago

      It’s very simple. One of these people blindly supports Israel no matter what it does, up to and including genocide, and the other one doesn’t.

  • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    1 day ago

    The Democratic Party are not friends to the people. They get rich being the opposition party and will only do the bare minimum necessary to get you to not vote the monsters back in, which is one of the reasons far-right parties are getting a draw world-wide when the alternative is neoliberalism.

    We have to force radical change (the no brainer stuff like social safety nets, massive justice reform, and massive election reform).

    The Sword of Damocles is twofold: the revolution of the people, and the wrath of rival dictators. And it’s not to be blunted, but to keep our officials serving the public rather than their own private interests.

    🧵⚔

    • lb_o@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      It is so pleasant to see that people in the US understand that.

      This is the extreme example, but if you look at Russia, that separation between the public and the politics had happened a long time ago. Now it is impossible to even convince people that politics has to serve their interests, and not the rich. And we see with the invasion how these lofeviews eventually unfolds.

      Wish Americans to be strong in their transformation into the real civil society. And wish you luck and to have required support for this transformation.

    • Wolf@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      And then we will get rid of the awful and outdated “First Past the Post” style of voting and the Electoral College. Maybe do some term limits for Supreme Court justices as well.

  • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s fun watching you kids realize that the Democratic party isn’t the place to go for real change. I was there after Kucinich lost the primary in 2000 and then when Gore gave up fighting for his votes.

    Also: You have to vote for them no matter how much you hate them. If Fetterman wins his primary next time I MUST vote for him or I am letting Republicans win.

    As opposed to Chuck Schumer who also lets Republicans win.

    • Corn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Helping a Fetterman win means not only does another republican win, but a republican now has power within the democratic party. Every Pelosi will have to lose an election, primary or general if we are to get a party that even desires to stop the Republicans.

      • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Republicans have had power in the Democratic Party for decades. Lieberman, Manchin, Sinema, and probably more I don’t remember.

        And everyone makes excuses for them rather than kicking them out.

        • Corn@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          Exactly, so when a Chuck Schumer wins a primary, feel no compulsion to vote for them in the general. Vote Blue No Matter Who folks were wrong the whole time.

    • octopus_ink@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      I was there after Kucinich lost the primary in 2000 and then when Gore gave up fighting for his votes.

      Me too grandpa.🙂

  • EightBitBlood@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    151
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Don’t forget Bernie.

    DNC had the same exact response. With the same exact Trump.

    Took the DNC ten fucking years to pull their head out of their ass long enough to complain about young men populism being the key to victory, despite literally pissing away all the young men populism voters they had with Bernie Sanders.

    Thank fuck it’s now blatantly obvious with Zohran.

    • x0x7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      There is something people are missing with Bernie. Bernie does happen to be Jewish, but he is not a Zionist, unlike for example Chuck Shumer. Then Hillary is not Jewish but she is a Zionist.

      The control system prefers Zionists for legislative positions but they absolutely require Zionists for administrative positions. So much so they won’t let someone escape a primary without the machine kicking into play. Even at the state level.

      • mlg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 day ago

        I mean really they don’t, I’m pretty sure 180 just voted against the impeachment of Trump. Literally just waiting to see which shill geriatric they’ll put up for 2028 and pull the same “vote for us or suffer Republicans” bs for the next election.

        I keep saying that if progressives in the DNC are being constantly blocked and cheated out of power, they need to split off and make their own party. They’re afraid that if they do, they’ll lose a majority against Republicans, but that’s already true because even bargain basement protection laws barely pass when the Dems do have a majority in congress, and they actively support bs Republican bills when a minority like right now.

        Splitting would render the DNC useless and simultaneously tap into the huge block of nonvoters that would turnout like how Mamdani’s voter base was largely a grassroots campaign.

        • x0x7@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          14 hours ago

          It’s funny. A lot on the right say the same thing about their representatives. They even call them RINOs (republican in name only). Funny how when republicans take control the spending goes up anyway.

          It’s almost like either party doesn’t actually do what they say they do and have an entirely different agenda. It would be interesting to see on what issues congressional dems and republicans agree on that the public disagrees with them on. That might tell us what the actual agenda is.

      • EightBitBlood@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        Oh I agree completely. Just to clarify: The DNC absolutely will not get it or care. This is what I was describing as more “apparant” now.

  • crusa187@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    133
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    So funny to see in real time the difference between their phony outrage over Trump’s arguably monstrous policies, VS their genuine fear over a socialist winning a mayoral race.

    This is why everyone who claims the way to fix Dems is via primaries is wrong. Dems will lie, cheat, or simply not hold primaries altogether, rather than risk an actual leftist winning the nomination.

    • zbyte64@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 day ago

      I still think we should support those that do primary if just to show the flippant double standards.

      • Zink@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        Plus it’s good if some of them win and pull the party in a reasonable direction. And having decent people in government is always nice.

        The structural flaws in our elections that force us into a two-party system are deeply entrenched and they aren’t going to change until this place burns down and starts over. If you aren’t willing to vote for a politician with good priorities because they were nominated by the democratic party, you can still be an influential voice but come election time the system is already designed to ignore your vote.

        • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          I’ve heard the “we should primary them and pull them in a direction”

          And after a few cycles of this I realized why the Democratic icon is an ass: Because they’re stubborn, ornery, and will refuse to understand.

          We are entirely fucked.

    • sturger@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Now watch as Dems throw their support behind the independent in order to undermine Zohran.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Theres like 2 people in the DNC who have voiced dislike of Zohran, and they’re getting fucking roasted on social media for it.

      Zohran Mamdani is a Democrat. He is the DNC candidate. Vote for the DNC, vote for Zohran Mamdani.

  • Cyrus Draegur@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    236
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    If they’re not with Zohran, they’re against Democracy.

    I mean this is kind of obvious at this point that the democrats and the republicans are both anti-democracy, just one covertly and the other overtly. But still. I want more people getting loud and angry at anti-democracy democrats.

    • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      75
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I mean at this rate with about %70 of democrats saying no to Bernie’s stop arm sales motions, we can already safely assume yes they are. They have only been caring about their seats for quite a while and the deals they have made to stay on those seats do not align with the aims and interests of people like Bernie and Zohran. That is why they try to stop such candidates as ferociously as Republicans.

      • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah, you’re just an Islamaphobe. I know this because you’re specifically focusing on Islam, rather than every other major religion.

      • AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.comBanned
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Spoken like a true chauvinist. The UK murdered tens of millions more in India alone under the guise of the values of enlightenment than Islam has in the past century and a half.

        • Bio bronk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Islam makes women 2nd class citizens it’s a guise for enslaving a whole gender. Fuck Islam. Defending it means you don’t value 50% of humans.

          • shads@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 day ago

            Yeah you’re right, unlike evangelical Christianity, which treats women as valuable and treasured members of society… Nah just kidding they are just ambulatory wombs that occasionally make noises as far as the evangelicals are concerned.

            I am disgusted by religion, all religions, but let’s not blind ourselves to the reality that when religion is an excuse for shitty behaviour it’s not restricted to a single religion, and its not like getting rid of the religion would remove the shitty behaviour it would just mean coming up with a new justification.

          • AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.comBanned
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Western chauvinism makes non-whites 2nd class citizens. It’s a guise for enslaving the whole global south. Fuck western chauvinism. Defending it means you don’t value 80% of humans.

      • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yes, of course. That must be why they tried ferociously to stop him from winning the primary with Islamophobic smears and are now freaking out that they failed, and why the corporate media (yes, even the “liberal” media) are all crashing out.

          • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            11 hours ago

            Here’s an article from the corporate media about the DNC’s response to Mamdani’s victory, and Here’s an article from independent leftist media about the Islamophobic attacks against him.

            I won’t include an article from right-wing media, but I’m sure you can guess how they’re coping with the electoral victory of a Muslim socialist immigrant born in Uganda to Indian parents (not well).

            The post we’re commenting under has also included some articles.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          Ah yes, the great DNC freakout of 2025. It was legendary. Why even Bill Clinton made such vile remarks as

          Congratulations @ZohranKMamdani on your victory in yesterday’s primary election and a well-run campaign. I’m wishing you much success in November and beyond as you work to bring New Yorkers together to tackle the city’s challenges and shape a stronger, fairer future,

          These horrible disgusting people would stop at nothing to keep them off their ticket. Except, of course, not inviting him to run on their ticket, for some reason.

          • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            They’re all maintaining decorum (something they would die before dropping) by congratulating him on his win while denouncing his policies and stopping short of endorsing him. Ever since his victory all the “liberal” corporate media has been praising the “energy” of his campaign while criticizing his policies as dangerous and painting his pro-palestinian views as anti-semitic. Don’t even try to pretend the way the DNC has been responding to this is normal. In nearly every other democratic primary the DNC have been quick to line up behind the victor.

    • Ostrichgrif@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      1 day ago

      Trump by no means barely beat Harris, she and Clinton were both around 220 votes and Trump has an easy 300.

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        The electrical college will always look different ways because winner takes all voting. It’s all that matters at the end, but a 1.5% change in the voters would have flipoed most of the battleground states. It was closer than many make it out to be

        • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          The fact that “closer” can be so diametrically opposed indicates a failure in the system.

          If it was close we’d have gotten, I don’t know, Mitt Romney or somebody.

          But the winner-take-all aspect means we get the dumbest, ugliest fascists ever. Just for a 1.5% difference.

          This is what a broken system looks like.

        • RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          15 hours ago

          …60 goddamn percent of the country either voted for Trump, or didn’t vote at all, meaning they voted for Trump. Explain to me how she barely lost.

          • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 hours ago

            That’s not even true. Less than 50% of the people who voted, voted for Trump.

            He didn’t do much better than 2020 when he lost. The U.S. population increased by 2.5% from 2020 to 2024.

            Numerically with the population growing by the 2.5% we saw a 4.5% drop in voting in 2024.

            Reasons are all speculation.