• Quilotoa
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    9 days ago

    Rule 1. When you’re having political problems at home, create a foreign enemy to distract the population.

  • brvslvrnst@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    9 days ago

    Lol sounds like he’s doing a great job in his role checks notes in charge of US defense.

    • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      Apparently the crucial moment for the US to attack was a few year ago, when they still had naval superiority. They missed their window luckily for us. Thanks to the PRC the US doesn’t get to use SE Asia and Europe as their cannon fodder.

    • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      9 days ago

      I remember how they bragged that the operation against Yemen was the biggest naval operation since WW2.

      And they lost that, against country having no navy and no airforce.

  • humanspiral
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    Lots of comments that “this is a false distraction to justify war on Panama”. War on Panama is about interdicting Chinese commerce with Brazil and other countries south of US. Including FDI in Panama to boost its cross ocean trade volume through a railway.

    This is more of a classified leak exposing US weakness and impotence. This does compromise stupid people’s faith in US protections across the world, and their rulers corrupt submission to US under propaganda of US protection.

      • humanspiral
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        I’m only aware of 30% tariffs on Chinese steel in Brazil, which is same mistake any manufacturing country can make. This was under Biden. They are unpopular, and Brazil still does significant trade with China.

        • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          a) we are not a manufacturing country. we mostly sell raw materials to china

          b) manufactured chinese imports are taxed 100%, not raw materials. think consumer goods. we have a few exceptions, like EVs

  • ef9357@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    8 days ago

    It’s not like China has to lift a finger, the US government is doing a fine job of destroying the country.

  • Bilb!@lem.monster
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    8 days ago

    I hope that’s true, but this is a common refrain with various adversaries used as the boogie-man.

    https://citationsneeded.libsyn.com/episode-117-the-always-lagging-us-war-machine

    The scam goes something like this: A weapons contractor and military-funded think tank publishes a supposedly neutral “report” or a handful “U.S. officials” run to a media outlet insisting the United States is “lagging behind” in a sector that incidentally coincides with said think tank’s funders or government entity’s interests. Credulous American media mindlessly repeats the claims, everyone acts panicked, treating the warning like a work of good faith, sober and objective analysis. Congress then reacts and uses media coverage to rationalize even more contracts to the very funders of the think tank that raised the warning, further bloating the Pentagon, State Department and CIA budgets. Rinse and repeat, rinse and repeat, all the while portraying the U.S.'s gargantuan defense expenditures as paltry and insufficient.

  • Inucune@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    9 days ago

    …and the US could make a China shaped nuclear crater to the west of Taiwan. Then everyone clapped.

    “Bro, what if…”

    • IttihadChe@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      Could they though? You think China would just sit around and let the U.S fire nuclear missiles at them without intercepting them and firing their own? Why are you so sure that wouldn’t just end up with a U.S sized crater north of Mexico?

      Also, dismissing any predictive situation as some crazy out there “what if” is hilarious.

      War games are an extremely important part of any strategy so that you don’t just walk right into an easily predictable slaughter because you “don’t care about what ifs”.