Just wondering as an American watching the EU pool resources and mostly work for the same common goals over my lifetime.

To clarify, I’m not saying that this would be a part of the United States of America, but a separate world power.

  • Avia Vik@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I truly hope so. And the best time to initiate this project is right now, when all of Europe is facing same issues that unite us

    • Scrollone@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I agree with you. But we have a problem that the US didn’t have: we all speak vastly different languages.

      • CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        The US did have that problem, too. There were settlers from all european countries who spoke all different languages, plus natives (albeit that the natives were genocided over time, so their languages were sorted out the other way), and at one point during the constitution process they had a vote on which language should become official. And it almost was german, btw.

        • Krik@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 hour ago

          nd at one point during the constitution process they had a vote on which language should become official. And it almost was german, btw.

          That’s a modern myth. IIRC there was a newspaper that had to decide to publish either in German or English and they decided in favor of English. The USA doesn’t have an official language but de facto it is English.

          • CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            39 minutes ago

            I looked it up and we’re both right and wrong. There was a vote, but it was about printing laws in german, additionally to english prints. And there is no federal official language, but some states codicized english as their official language, sometimes alongside other languages.

            However, my point still stands as in the beginning, there were many different languages and they somehow managed to find a common one.

      • Avia Vik@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Languages are just ways of communication. We will find a way to communicate, its not a problem. We all speak English, French, German or smth else that allows us to speak to most other Europeans

        Our real problem are nationalistic movements in many EU countries that oppose EU’s further integration

  • NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Probably not - it’s the continent that invented the term “balkanisation” after all. Also, at the moment the UK is on the outs and tinpot Orban is on the ins, so god knows where that is going.

  • RunawayFixer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    I hope for a small core of countries that further integrates their military, which can then later be joined by other countries. If smaller countries like Belgium, Netherlands, Denmark, Norway, Ireland (+ Scotland after their independence) got together in the near future and instead of each rebuilding (I suspect their armies have all been severely underfunded in the last 2 decades) their army separately, build one stronger new army, then they would all be stronger for it.

    The eu as it already exists could use some fundamental rule changes to deal with internal abuse. Orban has been a pseudo dictator for years now, and he just needs 1 other eu country to side with him to shield Hungary from real consequences. So what’s especially needed is more democracy and less veto powers.

    Things like education, culture, social welfare, … are imo better done on a regional level and thus should not be fully integrated.

    Edit: I added the “fully” because I think it would be good for the eu to set out a standard framework for compatibility and/or minimum standards, but the actual implementation should be left to the regions imo.

  • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    History comes in cycles. We’re entering an era of strong nationalism so I can’t believe that would happen any time soon. But once the world runs out of oil, the climate is decimated, and population comes crashing down because of restrictive immigration laws, there will be a sharp curve to the left and pro-EU that could lead to more interest in federation.

    Or not, and the EU will continue to crumble during the water wars.

  • m0darn
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    As a Canadian, could it be rebranded to Western Democratic Union (or something), so we can join? Also it might help UK undo its mistake if it didn’t have to admit its mistake.

  • EarMaster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I don’t think so. Of course it’s hard to predict what Europe will look like in 100 years, but I’d like to image the EU more as a service provider for its member states. Maybe the military will be combined and the economy is already very much linked together which will increase. But I don’t think the member states will cease to exist as sovereign nations. Europe is far more diverse not only in language but also in culture. That is in my opinion a strong feature of the union as it is a union in diversity.

  • banghida@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 hours ago

    There are at least a half a dozen countries in the EU with 1000 years of history behind them. I wonder how that weight of history blends with what the modern world requires.