• superkret@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    7 days ago

    By the way:
    They do that for 3 reasons: Keeping you on the site longer, which increases its rating with Google.
    Adding more space for ads.
    And preventing others from simply scraping and reposting the entire content on their site, since recipes by themselves can’t be copyrighted, but written stories can.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      7 days ago

      True.

      Although in Tolkien’s case, I think no one bothered to tell him that writers like Dickens were paid per-word for what they wrote and he just figured he’d do what everyone he grew up reading did.

      • jballs@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 days ago

        writers like Dickens were paid per-word

        Is that true? That explains Great Expectations. I had to read that in high school and it just went on and oooooon.

        • yeather
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          According to UC Santa Cruz, Dickens was not paid per word, but by installment. The novels were released in monthly installments, which culminated in a full novel. They do not mention Great Expectations specifically, but do say he would release a novel over 20 issues, costing 1 shilling per issue, making it easier for normal people to buy his novels since a full book cost around 31 shillings at the time and the common man only had to save one shilling a month instead of 31 in one go.

            • yeather
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 days ago

              Upon further research, get expectations was released weekly in his periodical over 9 months.

      • superkret@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 days ago

        How does that work?

        Now stir in the sour cream - “56&fHR+6AakOUH5&#3FJ” brand works best?

        • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 days ago

          You crazy?! Not in the instructions. In the narrative portion. Where I talk about my hike through the Yukon, where I meditated and during that time, hunter2

    • ILikeBoobies
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      On the google note

      It’s because Google prioritizes unique content and prioritizes the beginning of a web page more than the end

      If they put the recipe at the top it would be flagged as duplicate content

  • ObsidianZed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 days ago

    I only recently discovered two things.

    • Most recipe blogs have a Jump to Recipe button at the top.

    • The selfhostable mealie has a feature that lets you import recipes from most blogs with a simple Import from URL option.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 days ago

      Recipes blog. If it was a cookbook, you wouldn’t have to get through 20 pages before you got to the recipe.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      That doesn’t work anymore either, because they add a bunch of shit after the recipe now too.

      And, even worse, they often put important details about the recipe in the middle of their screed rather than with the recipe itself.

    • MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      Yeah, honestly, most blogs have a “skip to recipe” button. By now basically everyone knows why they do it (to keep their work from being ripped off), so I really don’t mind the mild inconvenience of clicking an extra button. They’re taking the time to share their expertise with the rest of us, I’m fine if they make sure they get credit for it.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        to keep their work from being ripped off

        I don’t see how this could possibly work. My recipe manager can extract the recipe from those pages faster than I can cluck that button

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 days ago

      The fact that you are expecting people to watch a 17-minute video to learn why you should spend about the same time reading someone’s personal journey to the recipe you want to get to suggest you don’t really understand the issue. Nor does the person who made that video.

      The other day, about an hour before it was time to cook my daughter dinner, I realized the steak I bought her was a cut of steak I’d never cooked before (I don’t even eat meat), so I tried to find information about the best way to cook it. And it took half of that hour.

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Why not just explain why instead of expecting people to watch some long video? Surely the reason can’t be that complicated.