• Александр@friends.deko.cloud
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    @serenity It is possible to use content warning and alt text in Friendica posts (not very convenient but it works).

    There is lack of other features though - can’t create or vote in polls, can’t upload video and audio, can’t block by domain.

    • petrescatraian@libranet.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      @shuro You can embed audio and video though, if it is uploaded to a different server and is publicly available. Here’s a random slice of pie from duckduckgo images to prove it (edit: there is a picture with a slice of pie below, but Lemmy does not show it):

      @serenity

  • serenity@jeremmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    Thanks all for the replies (I see one comment here on this instance, but twelve when I look at lemmy.ml). Nice to see more Friendica here!

    • petrescatraian@libranet.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      @serenity Well, I feel great that I can post and comment to Reddit with my FB account in this regard, haha ;)

      I am really afraid of not doxxing myself though, haha. On the former I am more vocal usually, while on the latter I am more personal. So now I have a mix of social identities that I use for both being vocal and personal.

        • petrescatraian@libranet.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          @anders I remember you had, I can’t remember, someone posted something on the Friendica support group, not sure if it was you or anyone else.

          Yea, I had the same issue as you. Indeed, federation between Friendica and Lemmy servers seems a bit problematic, I still search for my posts and comments on a separate Lemmy tab, unfortunately, don’t know if this is a Lemmy/Friendica issue or just related to ActivityPub, as [email protected] was saying in a previous comment. I am surprised that this comment made it through w/o such an input from my end, so wow! 😁

          servers@[email protected]

            • petrescatraian@libranet.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              @anders wow, speechless. I guess you never know where the problem comes from, haha.

              I previously tried to force-load my initial comment to this post as well, but nothing happened, wherever I tried. 😁

          • anders@rytter.me
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            @petrescatraian and this one made it as well, right? :D

            I solved the issue by spinning up my own instance :D it seems like a Libranet/Venera problem rather than a Friendica problem, because now it works fine for me.

  • notizie@poliverso.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    @serenity
    “When to use Friendica over Mastodon?”

    Short answer: always

    Long answer: Friendica is the software of the fedeverse that allows the most complete user experience. However, thanks to the fact that Mastodon was the first successful project on activitypub and to the fact that it addressed a very specific target (Twitter users), its users have always been much more numerous than those of other software and this has meant more money and more funding which has allowed the mastodon developers to improve many aspects.
    For this reason, as well as for contingent reasons (the immediacy of microblogging is an immanent feature), the comparison between Friendica and Mastodon highlights some aspects in which Mastodon is objectively superior. Between these:
    - an essential and compact timeline
    - universal compatibility, due simply to the fact that all other fediverse projects must adapt to mastodon if they don’t want to be cut off from the larger audience
    - a modern and ergonomic graphical interface (while the Friendica one looks like the alpha version of MySpace)
    - apparently faster servers: this is due to the fact that some fediverse virtualization and optimization projects are focused on mastodons; But this is also a consequence of the fact that the greater number of mastodon users allows the servers hosting the community to be financed with more donations. moreover, the increase in users of a single instance generates disruptions, slowdowns and shock waves for the entire faith universe. In fact, the disproportionate increase in mastodon users in the last three months has also led to a slowdown for smaller instances: today friendica servers are also slowed down due to the increase in mastodon users.
    - mastodon has an excellent moderation system that allows you to limit the proliferation of bots, spam and scams
    - mastodon is clearly aimed at an audience made up of former Twitter users; friendica on the other hand, despite being the only real alternative to Facebook, presents itself as an object without clear characterization, without a “strong message”, and aimed at a heterogeneous audience

    • petrescatraian@libranet.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      @notizie

      friendica on the other hand, despite being the only real alternative to Facebook, presents itself as an object without clear characterization, without a “strong message”, and aimed at a heterogeneous audience

      Yea, the fact that it was not that much cathered at being the alternative to something (in this case Facebook) really left it behind, although it is more feature complete. Hell, even diaspora has more users according to fediverse.observer. And given the development speed boost that followed the bird site takeover (which came along with the user influx), I’m afraid that Mastodon is likely to catch up and leave less room for Friendica to have a meaning for new users.

      At the moment, at least, there is an influx of new users going on for quite a few months, so it definitely seems to be taking off, but it still leaves Friendica behind many other social networks, sadly.

      Imo, Friendica missed some opportunities when it really had the chance of attracting new users, and given the extent of Facebook, it really could attract more users, possibly flip the balance, at least with today’s feature set. I only found recently about this whole Fediverse thing, but I was against Twitter due to the post character limit (why the hell should I have to create more than one post in order to post that seldom long idea that I have stuck in my head from time to time?), so I naturally disliked Mastodon’s model, although I like many other things at it. And over time I grew fond of its feature set. This is why I really hope Friendica will be able to take a part of the pie in the future.

      @serenity

  • rom@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Worth noting (since this isn’t mentioned anywhere in the text): Friendica is slow as fuck

    • zeitverschreib@freundica.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      @rom

      I first struggled with my single-user Friendica instance after I added all followed accounts from Mastodon. Very slow, sometimes even not responding at all.

      After tweaking some settings the site is running quite smootly. So it depends on the setup.

      Yes, Mastodon out-of-the-box is faster on most machines, but Friendica can be made very usable.

      Via clients like WhaleBird or Fedilab, I don’t feel any difference.
      @serenity

      • eshep@social.trom.tf
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 years ago

        @serenity @f00fc7c8 @rom It’s not even sorta fast, but I’ve found it to be the most functional for me out of the bunch. In addition to Friendica, I’ve played around with Diaspora, Mastadon, Pleroma, Misskey, plus the forks Calckey and Akkoma. Friendica’s ability to easily follow tags and rss feeds, plus the lemmy and diaspora integration, as well as the ease of import/export really shows where some of the others are lacking. That said, UI/UX customization in Friendica leaves quite a bit to be desired.

        • anders@rytter.me
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          @serenity @rom @eshep @f00fc7c8 I tried to import/move my profile to my own instance but I got an error saying page not found :S did you succeed with that`?

          I agree with what you say. Is your experience that Friendica is slower than the others? My guess would be that Friendica is programmed in PHP which executes slower than other programming languages.

          • Александр@friends.deko.cloud
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            @eshep @serenity @f00fc7c8 @rom @anders I am not sure it is about PHP but it depends how you see it.

            Friendica can be rather resource-intensive, especially for public instance. Some of them feel slow because they are somewhat overloaded. On badly overloaded servers delivery times suffer.

            Also mostly static interface of Friendica which I like also means most operations reload the entire page. E.g. when you go to someone’s profile it can take the same time (say 8 seconds) on Friendica and Misskey/Pleroma/Mastodon but on the latter you don’t see the page redrawn - it stays the same and something spins loading the data. On Friendica you see full page reload. It is perceived slower.

            Also in some aspects Friendica is inherently slower by design. E.g. when posting comment on Mastodon it is fired off right away (well, almost), on Friendica it is queued for delivery and the worker runs on interval (usually every 2-5 mins). It isn’t a problem but feels more like email or old school forum while other platforms can feel more like instant messaging.

      • poVoq@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Did you try the recent 13.x release of Misskey? Apparently it got a massive speed improvement. Didn’t try it myself yet though and also don’t really have fresh memory to compare it against.

      • rom@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Then maybe I wasn’t very lucky with my instance choice (libranet.de), because jfc, doing anything, from sharing a post to simply browsing the timeline, was a chore

  • petrescatraian@libranet.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    @[email protected] wrote:

    * No option for a content warning in a post you’re creating. This option is heavily used in Mastodon e.g to warn people for a post about a sensitive topic e.g politics. Friendica does respect content warnings from Mastodon though.
    * No option to add a text to an image. Mastodon has this option to include visually impaired people.
    * No option to blur an image. In Mastodon this is a feature similar to a content warning for a text.

    Have you tried BBCodes? while in your node press on your profile name in the top-right corner of your screen (if you’re using the Frio theme) > Help > BBCode tag reference to see what you can do. They can do everything you said.

        • Yeah, I get the origins. I wish there’d be a mime-type update to move it into modern times.

          The irony is that they got it right in the 80’s. Simple markup conventions forced by pre-mime text/plain emails and, later in the 90’s, SMS are still the basis for most lightweight markup languages.

        • 𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Is it? Really? Easier for non-technical users than Markdown?

          Most simple markup languages (djot, markdown, asciidoc, textile, etc.) are based on 7-bit ASCII markup that people have been using in email and SMS for decades. They’re compact and straightforward. BBCode is a bastardization (I use that in its technical sense more than as a pejorative) of HTML; it’s verbose and unintuitive.

          Give a non-technical person with no other information a keyboard and a plain text field and ask them to emphasize a word in some text. I’ll bet the first thing they do is all caps. If you ask them to do it without caps, I bet you’ll get something like surrounding the text in asterisks or hashmarks, but regardless, what you won’t get is bracket-B-bracket followed by a closing tag.

          BBCode is just straight-up HTML for people allergic to pointy characters. That’s hardly non-technical.

          • Александр@friends.deko.cloud
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            @sxan I have different opinion on this but I am not UX specialist.

            Surely to just highlight something it is easier to use underscore or similar characters but when you want to have variety of formatting styles in my opinon text tags are easier to remember and use. Yes, more to type but BBCode-enabled solutions usually provide some sort of assist.

            Also Markdown tends to conflict with user input more often which is confusing.

            • 𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              I think it comes down to: when we’re dealing with truly non-technical users, we hope the clients have some sort of UI to insert codes; very non-tech users aren’t going to be very handy with any markup, and the best thing for them is some sort of WYSIWYG interface, or at very least an “insert markup buttons” feature.

              For the people writing markup by hand, IMO markup that minimally interferes with reading when it is unline (unrendered) is best. HTML, BBCode, and other heavy markup gets in the way more than (e.g.) djot, asciidoc, markdown, and other languages that descend from intuitively evolved markup from 70’s email systems.

              Vivat diversitas.

    • Sam@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Thanks for the info about BBCode. I didn’t know about this option before. However I can’t figure out how to implement some of it. I was testing out alt text and am pretty sure I was formatting the BBCode properly. Once I created the post, it would display the image but I could never figure out how to view the alt text. Do you know how to implement it?

      • petrescatraian@libranet.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        @Samlane86 Guess it shows up when the image does not load properly. Or when you hover your cursor over the image. Usually if you type should work just fine. That’s what I do at least.

        Edit: here’s an example (edit2: there is an image below, but it is only visible on Friendica; maybe because it is on a different server):

        Also use the preview pane/button before posting a comment, so you can make adjustments if something goes wrong. In my experience, lists do not work properly unless you use * to make lists, as Friendica does support markdown as well. However, it turns markdown into bbcode, so if I have to edit a comment with a list, I have to switch back to Markdown formatting there.

      • Sam@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Correction: I just tried again and viewed the post on Mastodon. The alt text does appear there, so the code does work. Just not when viewed on Friendica. Am I just looking in the wrong places? Or does it just not display natively?

  • sproid@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    IMO Friendica feels like beta software or outdated with no signs of improvement. Similar to how LibreOffice used to be for years. The layout is just not streamlined enough. It’s unnecessary complicated and the UI looks outdated on all themes.