• Eldritch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    163
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Is she repentant or proud. If the former that’s definitely worth some respect. If the latter, well at least it’s honesty.

    • Having a moment to finally read the article. Seems she’s repentant. So that’s definitely some respect.
      • Eldritch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        43
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Definitely. It’s still good to see and acknowledge on the rare occasion it happens. To help remind ourselves that no matter how divided we seem. No matter the atrocities they enable/justify because of propaganda. If you break the propaganda they’d be likely allies. It puts things back in perspective.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          38
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          I am a massive critic of 12-step programs, but she credits it for getting her out of the MAGA cult and admitting that what she did was wrong, so they do have some value.

          • Eldritch@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Yep, ultimately nothing. No intervention, no program regardless of number of steps. Will help anyone not open to or seeking change. The mandatory way they can be applied sometimes definitely reeks a bit of grifting. But they can work for the right person when you find them. That’s a big but for sure though.

    • LostWon
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      77
      ·
      5 months ago

      Repentant. In the interview, she said that at some point people on Twitter opened her eyes and she realized that she was in a cult. She thinks she belongs in jail.

      • Default_Defect@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        5 months ago

        Maybe its the level of stubborn shithead that I’m used to dealing with, but its hard for me to comprehend someone capable of the self reflection she shows falling for Trumpian bullshit in the first place.

        • LostWon
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          5 months ago

          Anyone can be ushered into a cult if their channels of information are limited, especially in this increasingly isolated world. Something related I’d estimate is true of most people, regardless of affiliation, is that they can be viciously loyal to communities they strongly identify with.

          When chances arise that they might be receptive to it, the right person/people can reach out to misled folks like her. Condescending or patronizing them will just push them away. Should be obvious no one is going to listen to people they perceive as not recognizing their dignity as a human being.

          Probably the only ones among that crowd that are truly impossible to reach would be the subset that are as narcissistic as Trump himself and see themselves in him-- the ones who do fully get what Trump is doing, and like it. Many of them are likely in hate groups or working in positions of authority because they want to power trip over others. The rest are just ordinary people who were brought up in a way that made an opening for them to be duped.

        • LostWon
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          Thanks for the correction. I shouldn’t use those terms interchangeably.

        • LostWon
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          I didn’t read it. A day or two before this was posted, I watched a video commentary where the clip of her interview was played. I heard it in her own words. Unfortunately I go through a lot in a week so I don’t remember whose video I saw it on. The interview was originally on MSNBC though, so you can probably find the original clip by searching for that.

  • andyburke@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    103
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    This is what a real American looks like. Someone who can admit when they’re wrong, learn, and do the right thing.

    • stoicmaverick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      5 months ago

      I think you mean ‘grownup’ this is what adults are SUPPOSED to do, but it’s still profound to see in action. Good on her I say.

      • Azzu@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        I think you either put teenagers down or give these people too much credit. Even non-grownups do this.

  • pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    ironically as the only person who seems to take responsibility and show regret, she’s the one most deserving of a pardon. but hey the American justice system has never been about rehabilitation; only about which team you’re on.

  • ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    The world is getting weirder by the minute. Convicts rejecting a presidential pardon on moral grounds? And people who participated in an attempted coup to boot? That’s unheard of!

    If something this weird doesn’t tell you the republic is on the verge of complete and irreversible dysfunction, I don’t know what does.

    That woman restores a bit of faith in humanity in me though.

    • metaStatic@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      on the verge

      How bad is the media over there? The republic has been circling the drain for at least 40 years and is no longer capable of self correcting, if it ever really was.

  • Phoenixz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    5 months ago

    At least there are still some people out there that can do bad and then at least learn

  • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    12 steppers really do have a religious response to things. I guess that’s one of the few ways to fundamentally change your outlook on the world. Be nice if it wasn’t an actual religious program though. And that was the key for both that rejected the pardons: they were 12 steppers.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Unfortunately, it was formed from a prayer group, and as much as some of my fellow atheists have told me that you can be an atheist and a 12-stepper (and maybe they can deal with the cognitive dissonance), there is just no legitimately non-religious interpretation of step 11. The whole “anything can be your higher power” concept I’ve been told by those atheists simply cannot conform to step 11:

      Sought through prayer and meditation to improve our conscious contact with God as we understood Him, praying only for knowledge of His will for us and the power to carry that out.

      You substitute “God” with pretty much anything non-deistic and that sentence simply does not rationally work.

      I’ve always suspected that the biggest reason 12-step programs like AA do work for some people is that it’s a form of group therapy.

      • Zacharoni@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        You can substitute for the universe, the program and people in it, or nature and I’d say it still works. Just how you frame prayer or meditation. One of the definitions of prayer is a solemn request. The purpose of having “God” in the 12 steps is to have a belief in something “greater” than yourself. To me the group of alcoholics who got me sober is something “greater” than myself because I truly couldn’t do it alone. The prayer and meditation can just be used almost as a manifesting of intention. If I pray that I be more tolerant patient and kind to those around me, than that’s more likely to be on my mind whether I’m intentionally sending that prayer to a deity, the universe, nature, or the idea of the group as a whole. I say this as a 12 stepper myself that is non religious. That being said a lot of people use God or a deity as a higher power, but just saying it’s certainly not a requirement.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          No. You can’t. Because those make no sense when you rewrite it.

          Sought through prayer and meditation to improve our conscious contact with the universe as we understood it, praying only for knowledge of its will for us and the power to carry that out.

          The universe only has a will if you’re not an atheist.

          Sought through prayer and meditation to improve our conscious contact with the program and people in it as we understood them, praying only for knowledge of their will for us and the power to carry that out.

          This only makes sense if you think praying to a group will make them force you to do something. Which is nonsense.

      • Kornblumenratte@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        If you want to detach step 11 from it’s Christian roots, you cannot just substitute “God” in its wording. That yields nonsense, as you are stating correctly.

        The aim of Step 11 is “knowledge of His will for us and the power to carry that out.” In non–religious terms I would call this aim “committment”.

        The means of Step 11 to achieve commitment is spirituality, spirituality being a set of basic convictions that provides meaning, purpose and a sense of belonging.

        A “neutral” Meta—Step 11 might be worded something like:

        “We consciously develop a healthy spiritual basis for our live, gaining motivation and comittment through it.”

        As any religion, philosophy, ideology or other system of basic convictions can provide this spiritual basis for an individual, the formulation of a more concrete and helpful Step 11 will differ between e.g. communists, buddhists, naturists and epicureans.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          You’re basically saying the 12 steps only work for atheists if they aren’t the actual 12 steps. You do realize that, right?

          • Kornblumenratte@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Depends on your definition of “actual”.

            I totally agree that the original 12 steps cannot work for anyone not believing in an Abrahamitic god.

            I’d say that you need the actual steps for other people, i.e. the steps the AA are really taking, not the steps they claim to take.

      • rektdeckard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s simpler than all that. Satanists would say God is just You, or some version of yourself that is all the things you wish you could be. The fact that you are there praying means you have a good idea of what needs to change, and are searching for the strength within yourself.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          As I said, that makes it irrational. People like you say that, but when it actually comes to rewriting it, it makes no sense at all:

          Sought through prayer and meditation to improve my conscious contact with me as I understand myself, praying only for knowledge of my will for me and the power to carry that out.

          • rektdeckard@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Dunno what you’re on about, makes complete sense to me. Just requires some mental flexibility.

              • rektdeckard@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                It takes conscious effort to be in touch with your deeper thoughts and emotions, so in a sense yes. Not everything that is known to the self is known to the conscious mind. Didn’t think that would be controversial.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  “In a sense.” i.e. you have to make some really convoluted interpretations to make it work.

              • y0kai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                I think the key here, and I’m speaking from the POV of a 12-stepper, is the idea of introspection.

                Literally, all I learned from 12 step was to look at myself deeply, intensely, and with honesty; learn to forgive myself for the shitty things I’ve done; learn to forgive others for the shitty things they’ve done to me, while taking responsibility for my part in whatever that may have been; and to get into the habit of practicing those things daily.

                The part I think you’re missing with the quote above that you seem to be taking it literally, when in the quote itself implies that it and the idea of God in general, is to be interpreted by the reader however they see fit.

                Sought through prayer and meditation to improve our conscious contact with God as we understood Him, praying only for knowledge of His will for us and the power to carry that out.

                I also think that the “sought through prayer and meditation” does not necessarily imply that one must do both, as it is speaking in the first person plural. Meaning, some people may pray without “meditating”, while others like myself may choose to meditate without “praying” and you can still say of the group “We prayed and meditated” without contradicting oneself. An “and/or” probably would’ve worked best there, but whatever.

                Now, as to whether I think AA and NA are culty? Absolutely, and it’s a big reason why I stopped attending.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  “And” doesn’t just imply both, that’s exactly what “and” means. It doesn’t mean either/or, it means both. I have no idea why you’re suggesting otherwise.

                  A ham and cheese sandwich isn’t ham or cheese, it’s both.
                  A husband and wife is always two people.
                  A horse and rider is not either a horse or a person riding a horse.

                  You must know this.

      • TurtleSoup@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        Honestly out of all 12 steps it’s the first step that actually hits the hardest.

        “We admitted we were powerless over alchohol (although you could substitute alcohol for anything really)—that our lives had become unmanageable.”

        As my shrink used to say “the hardest part of overcoming a problem or mistake is admitting you have a problem/made a mistake.”

      • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I guess I can’t separate it from a religious program because fundamentally the ethics of it are theistic and not humanistic. They’re handed down morals that come from a higher moral power. When you get into esoteric ethical debates with Christian apologists, and they describe atheists as being incapable of being moral, that’s what they mean. They believe morals must come from something greater than ourselves and cannot come from a human source.

        To put it another way, AA is remarkably similar to Aristotle’s virtue ethics which was used by Aquinas to describe the origins of morality. Similar to AA’s higher power, Aristotle derived the moral authority for virtue ethics from the “prime mover.” Same concept, in essence.