It really should be done this way, there’s always good west teams that miss the playoffs and some awful East teams make it yearly.

  • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    i don’t think you’re ever gonna get a majority of owners to approve this. not only would eastern conference teams not want it for obvious reasons, the travel would also hit coastal teams much harder than central/mountain teams.

    Such a revision would require half of the East to vote in favor, with many middling teams voting against their best interests. No one we spoke with expects that to change.

  • streetfestival
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    Per the article, half of Eastern Conference teams would need to sign onto this, which experts don’t think will happen any time soon. Given that additions of Las Vegas +1 other team are obviously on the league’s horizon, I could see this 1-16 seeding and possibly re-allocating a couple teams to different conferences happening with the expansion to 32 teams

    • TrippyFocus@lemmy.mlOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yeah I think when expansion happens is the time they’ll do it if it ever happens. Outside of that I agree the East teams won’t do it.

  • JeffKerman1999@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    There’s too many playoff spots, it should be fewer and based only on elo ranking instead of number of wins, since one division is good and one has 3 good teams and the rest is garbage