• Ephera@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Zero-setup snapshotting, GUIs for system settings, more sophisticated repo management, less custom-patching of software, more utilitarian than minimalist.

    • bravemonkey
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      For me it’s that Tumblweed at least uses BTRFS by default, so rolling back to a previous snapshot is a breeze if needed.

      • NotAnArdvark
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        19 hours ago

        I switched to Tumbleweed from Ubuntu but was wary of the rolling release idea. I went in thinking “Well yeah, they need a file system like BTRFS to back out of bad updates.” And this was the case for me when Zoom stopped working after an update during a month when I really needed Zoom to be working. But, somehow, BTRFS has turned into a personal requirement for me everywhere. Things went wrong on Ubuntu too, wouldn’t it have been nice to be able to easily roll back the change that did it?

        So, I still find it irritating how often little things change with Tumbleweed, but I love having BTRFS in the background making sure I can back out of any major issues.

        • floofloof
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Are there any actual controlled comparative studies of filesystems, rather than just anecdotes from the internet?

          • ReallyZen@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            17 hours ago

            In my case, The rollback feature bricked its onw disk because on a 30g system partition, an install with a separate home partition (not included in the backups) will drown itself in factory settings backups.

            It’s a great feature. Give it ample space and trim down on the all the snapshots afterwards.