- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
KEY POINTS
- The Department of Justice late Tuesday indicated that it was considering a possible breakup of Google as an antitrust remedy.
- The DOJ said it was “considering behavioral and structural remedies that would prevent Google from using products such as Chrome, Play, and Android to advantage Google search.”
- The judge has yet to decide on the remedies, and Google will likely appeal, drawing out the process potentially for years.
Neat!
Do Amazon and Facebook too.
And then everything too big to fail! Too big to fail = too big.
It’s not like the knowledgeable people, or systems/infrastructure all disappear if a business fails. Business is basically a bunch instructions for people moving a bunch of shit around for money. Literally nothing about it is so unique it cannot be reproduced.
And then also Physically split up Elon, billionaires need to learn how to exist in a society of laws and consequences instead of above it.
Lets call back to classics and do it to AT&T again, too.
There should just be a law that just periodically breaks up AT&T every few years.
There should just be a law that just periodically breaks up
AT&Tall companies every few years.Given capitalisms inevitable march towards monopoly, this would just be good business.
AT&T De-reunion Tour
AT&T classic or new AT&T (Verizon, sprint/t-mobile)?
Yes.
Also break up ISPs. I have the local monopoly and 4 red herrings providers allowed to operate to give the illusion of competition.
And force fiber installation. I have plenty of fiber in my area… it just stops at the boundary of every apartment complex.
I have no doubt
AlphabetGoogle would try to delay any breakup as long as physically possible, but this would be a huge win against big tech if it went ahead. It’d probably be quite the win for public privacy as well, as it’d decouple these widely used platforms from Google.Only considering*? :/
“considering” is entirely the problem with this conservative democrat president
There are the Trump cases that are objectively easy to prosecute (especially the stolen document case), since the law is clear and no good lawyer wants to represent Trump. Here the DOJ has clearly been dragging his feet for reasons that are unrelated to the legal system.
Then there are these antitrust cases that are objectively EXTREMELY complex, and where the legal arguments have to be very carefully constructed to withstand a challenge from the best lawyers money can buy. Complain about the former, not the latter
I thought the stolen documents case WAS being prosecuted? By Jack Smith?