I’m not blindly hating. I despise the asshole responsible for the choice being taken away from me for many major distros and I wish him the plague for his manipulative approach in getting there.
I’m not blindly hating. I despise the asshole responsible for the choice being taken away from me for many major distros and I wish him the plague for his manipulative approach in getting there.
AI did boom, but people don’t realize the peak happened a year ago.
A simple control algorithm “if temperature > LIMIT turnOffHeater” is AI, albeit an incredibly limited one.
LLMs are not AI. Please don’t parrot marketing bullshit.
The former has an intrinsic understanding about a relationship based in reality, the latter has nothing of the likes.
systemd
and a giant “fuck you” to Lennart Poettering for that. Not for creating an init system option - but for lobbying it into major distributions, instead of letting the users decide what they prefer. May he forever stub his toes on furniture.
If the AI boom is a dud,
Whaddya mean, “if”? Emperor wears no clothes…
beyond root processes, none that I am aware of. Hence I configured all my internet applications and steam to run in a jail :) firejail & bubblewrap come as native packages, unlike the flatpak contents
Yeah, after posting it occurred to me how I would describe the two different ways in which I use the word:
“one way or another”, “that being said” / “further” -> your example “Anyways, I’ll say goodbye now […]”
“despite that” / “nevertheless” -> “Junk food is not healthy, but I’m gonna have a burger anyway[s]”
to which you added a third meaning(?) which, now that I try to describe it in other words, also appears to me as best translated with 3) “one way or another” / “this is happening independently of what is currently being discussed” -> your example “I was going there fore Drag Queen Story Hour anyway”
interesting that etymology of the word explains the origin of both forms - “in any way” vs. “any ways” - which makes sense to my ears, as “in” only fits a singular way “in a way”, not “in a ways”.
Which also means that both are grammatically correct but it makes it understandable how some people would prefer the “anyways” form with the “in” word no longer being used.
Confusing I guess, I always assumed “anyways” to be a different word (grammatically) without ever having a clear idea with one being an adverb, what the other could be… clownface
See the other reply - I could only answer for the store I use on my google-free phone. F-Droid is just an alternative (free) app store that you download as APK & install, which does not require your phone number or payment info like fcking google pieces of sht
isn’t flatpak by definition relying on a second software source, hence 2x as much risk as relying on a single source (your OS repo)?
Not a native speaker, but shouldn’t the word in this meme be anyways?
It’s available on F-Droid at least.
Warning: highly addictive :)
The Last Door (1 & 2)
Darkside Detective
Thank me later.
I love everything about this story.
Oh, so this is why she makes these loud muauw sounds even an hour after eating her full ;) (No, she actually wants to play then)
N00b. True pros accomplish O((n^2)!)
May I suggest you spend time with your cat & not online? All the best!
to me, that clearly sounds like the best way to do it. ^^
That is indeed exactly my point. LLMs are just a language-tailored expression of deep-learning, which can be incredibly useful, but should never be confused for any kind of intelligence (i.e. logical conclusions).
I appreciate that you see my point and admit that it makes some sense :)
Example where I think pattern recognition by deep learning can be extremely useful:
But what I am afraid is happening for people who do not see why a very simple algorithm is already AI, but consider LLMs AI, is that they mentally decide to call AI what seems “AGI” / “human-like”. They mistake the patterns of LLMs for a conscious being and that is incredibly dangerous in terms of trusting the answers given by LLMs.
Why do I think they subconsciously imply (self-)awareness / conscience? Because to not consider as (very limited) AI a control mechanism like a simple room thermostat, is viewing it as “too simple” to be AI - which means that a person with such a view makes a qualitative distinction between control laws and “AI”, where a quantitative distinction between “simple AI” and “advanced AI” would be appropriate.
And such a qualitative distinction that elevates a complex word guessing machine to “intelligence”, that can only be made by people who actually believe there’s understanding behind those word predictions.
That’s my take on this.