• Wolf314159@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    How exactly?

    Also, my phone charges slower with a wireless charger.

    Lots of hand wavy theories and generalizations in the answers below, some of them sound very convincing. None of them actually cite any sources or backup those theories with data.

    Here’s my own acedotal experience. I’ve put my phone down on a seemingly well designed wireless charging pad every night for almost 4 years and this phones battery has shown zero sign of deterioration that I can see. This is the first phone I’ve ever owned with wireless charging and also the first with a battery that hasn’t given up the ghost in 2 years or less. The same pad also charges my smart watch every night, which doesn’t even have any other option for charging.

    Next they’ll be telling you to avoid using cruise control on the highway because it will wear out the transmission. Use your phone as it was designed to be used and stop worrying.

    • Franklin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Magnetic charging loses some energy in the form of heat on both coils.

      Technologies like MagSafe lessen the severity of energy loss via ensuring the coils allign, however there is still some energy lost in the form of heat.

      This is just a limitation of electromagnetic induction.

      It’s a producer of heat placed right next to the battery.

      This inefficiency also makes it take more energy to charge your battery. However, I would imagine it’s a nominal amount.

      • Wolf314159@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        That’s an interesting theory. I’d like to see some numbers because I really doubt that this heating could be anywhere close to the many other kinds of heat produced through normal phone use. Especially considering that you’re unlikely to be stressing the biggest sources of heat in your phone (the screen and the processor) while it’s sitting in a wireless charging cradle. Also, the charging circuits certainly monitor and adjust for this kind of heat dissipation specifically and are able to control it far better than, for example, the sun hitting the screen or a warm pocket.

        • lobut
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I remember LTT wanting to find out the damage that wireless or fast charging does but found that the way we charge our phones mattered more or something: https://youtu.be/AF2O4l1JprI

          I found the segment and may have summarized it incorrectly but I can’t rewatch the video entirely right now.

        • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          The charging circuit will maintain a “safe” temperature, sure, but using any battery monitor app you like, you can clearly see for yourself that when wireless charging, the phone will sit at a higher temperature during the process, than when wired charging. And every fraction of a degree matters. Not when you use the feature once, but if you do it every day, always charging at a higher temperature, it WILL shorten the lifespan of the battery. The same way every charge does, but to a slightly higher degree for every fraction of a degree in higher temperature.

          The battery does not suffer as much damage from heat when discharging, or when just sitting there, not that that is good for it, either. But every extra bit of thermal strain WHILE charging, causes more damage than if it were running cooler. That’s simply a fact of lithium ion batteries.

        • Franklin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          I can only offer you my experience-based evidence, but three magnetic chargers I’ve used have all made my phone significantly hotter then charging it at the equivalent speed with a cable.

          This has been true across 6 Android devices. Two from Google. Four from Samsung. However, I will also say that because of this trend, I stopped using wireless chargers about a year and a half ago, so it’s quite possible they might have improved since then.

          • Wolf314159@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yes, the tech has gotten a lot better. 6 phones over about 12 years (rough length of time since debut of inductive charging in smartphones) averages to about 2 years per phone. If you weren’t getting the flagship phone each year that lifetime would be shorter. That was comparable to the lifetime of each over my phone’s during that same time, none of which had wireless charging. The phone I have now is the first I’ve had to use inductive charging and it has already lasted twice as long as any of the others and shows now signs of deterioration.

            • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              So your anecdotal evidence trumps everyone elses, as well as actual knowledge of the chemistry involved?

            • Franklin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              I typically use my phones for longer than two years. This included both mine and my wife’s devices.

    • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      The problem is heat, not charging speed. A wired charger heats the phone less than a wireless charger, and a slow charger heats it less than a fast one.

      It’s not like wireless charging will literally destroy your battery instantly, but it WILL do so faster than wired charging at the same speed.

      You could offset the heat by charging even slower via wireless (easy with something that has a small battery to begin with, like a watch) but no matter what method is used, the one that runs the battery the coolest WILL last the longest, whether the difference is just one year out five, more, or less.

    • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I don’t know but anecdotally I’ve experienced this with every single phone I’ve had that’s been wireless charging.

      It just shortens its life somehow. I thought I was crazy. It didn’t make sense unless it does fancy shit with the crystals inside or it heats it badly

        • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Seeing as you’re unhappy with the actual answers, I’m thinking you just wanted to be agreed with.

            • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Which only states that wireless charging will wear out your battery faster than wired. Not that it’s critically damaging the instant you opt to use it, or that it will shorten the lifespan of a device to nothing.

              There is a difference, that’s straight up true. One method has the battery sitting at a temperature that is worse for the chemistry involved. That is indisputable. Super fast fast charging that only slows down to keep an already hot battery from becoming dangerous, essentially redlining it for the whole process, has the exact same downsides in terms of thermals, except that wireless charging, being inherently slower for equivalent temperatures, keeps the battery warm for longer.

              What exactly the difference ends up being, varies from application to application, and from device to device. Obviously, if you lower the charge speed of wireless until it doesn’t heat the battery any more than wired, there wont be a difference, but then you could just do the same for wired charging, and have the battery last even more cycles.

              Bottom line, whatever option runs the battery the coolest on a given device, WILL CAUSE THE LEAST WEAR. That’s simply true.