• SSJMarx@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 minutes ago

    Similar in size to the bus I used to take to work every day when I lived in Japan. I miss being able to wake up thirty minutes before I had to be there and still making it on time.

  • derf82@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 hours ago

    No medieval city claims that. Hell, they are more walkable and transit oriented than more modern cities that were designed for cars. Stop with the straw men.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 hours ago

      No medieval city claims that.

      Its a common enough argument in the UK. I’ve even seen a few instances in which bus stops have been taken down because people were complaining about the traffic they created (small street with no passing lane, so when the bus stops, the dozen cars behind it are bottled up).

      None of the busybodies trying to sabotage the local transit system seems to want to recognize the twelve cars behind the bus as the problem, of course.

      • derf82@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 minutes ago

        Saying they don’t like the location of a bus stop is not saying you can’t have busses.

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 hours ago

    If you don’t have room for busses now, when will you have room for all the parking required for everyone to drive a car around all the time?

  • Hupf@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Here in my town, they simply have a refurbished van with like 12 seats hauling people around.

    • Etterra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I’ve seen those. In the suburbs here they often have call-ahead pickup to specific locations, like the only remaining mall or the library.

  • wieson@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    16 hours ago

    It’s not the medieval cities that fight tooth and nail to prevent public transit.

  • archiduc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    1 day ago

    In case you missed the markings on it, it’s also free and runs on electricity, which in France is low carbon.

    • Ricky Rigatoni@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I wonder how much of the length cutting was just from being able to remove the ICE and all its associated components.

      • Comment105@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        And the distinction is pointless. It’s a bus. It is. It simply is a bus. Some kind of bus.

        Bus.

        • Damage@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Shuttles tend to be free of charge more often than buses, for various reasons. This shuttle being gratis does not imply that any other buses in the area are free.

          • Comment105@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Why should the name of the vehicle type depend on whether some governments have a tendency to make them free? It’s still a bus. A small bus. A shuttle and a bus. Perchance a shuttle bus. Or just either. But definitely both.

            • Damage@feddit.it
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Dude, it’s not a matter of vehicle type, even trains can be shuttles. It just means that its purpose is to bring people from one point to another without stops, usually from some transportation hub. It’s a shuttle because IT’S WRITTEN ON ITS SIDE.

    • AeonFelis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 hours ago

      They don’t need to sit that many. It’s not an interstate route that runs thrice a day and carries 300 people in each run. For it to be an alternative to cars you need to have lots of route and they need to be quite frequent - which means less people in each minibus.

      • SSJMarx@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 minutes ago

        The ones I used to take ran every ten minutes and we would pack thirty to forty people on for each trip during rush hour. They really needed to bump it to one bus every five minutes from about 6am to 8am if only for safety reasons, but even packing them to standing capacity like we did I never worried that I wouldn’t be able to get on and get to work in the morning.

    • glaber@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      13 hours ago

      My hometown has very similar ones and they can hold up to 25 people adding up seating and standing space, don’t underestimate them

  • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    The opposite is true for the US. Because of the abhorrently large firetrucks you can’t have smaller roads.

    • Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Also because everything in the US is spread out except for urban areas, mass transit just won’t work well for a large part of the population. Didn’t help that what transit infrastructure existed came under assault by the oil/car companies of the time, so many places went full automobile.

      • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Half of the US is a stripmall 20km away from a suburb on one end and corn on the other with a parking lot in the middle