• T156@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        They did point out that they believed the food to be safe in the restaurant.

        They might have thought everything was above board, but it turned out to not be the case.

        • Phil_in_here
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          But you forget that the guy chose to have his allergies, just like his sister chose to be too poor for basic modern medicine.

          The true victims are the restaurant (I bet they ran out on the bill when he had “almost” anaphylaxis) and Pfizer for having their good name slandered on the internet.

    • LaVacaMariposa@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      No, but if there’s a decent possibility that you might die if someone is not careful with your food, and you don’t have access to an epi pen, then why risk your life for a single meal?

    • RBG@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Right, this is a total binary question, there is obviously no nuance in how sick or disabled someone is so just kill them all and be done with it… /s in case someone misses the obvious sarcasm.