• Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    No they shouldn’t. It seems she’s mostly in her right. There doesn’t seem to be an easement, which would mean the pipe on her land is hers. It sounds like the problem had been going on for a long time, and she decided to fix it.

    And, in typical Florida/conservative style, they didn’t want government involvement until they had a problem that needed fixing. Which I find doubly hilarious.

    The community should be angry at themselves and their leadership

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      For years, she has claimed the 110-foot pipe — which runs along a 20-foot easement between her home and the adjacent house — has eroded her yard

      Sounds like it is on an easement and she’s just claiming it’s not, either way, doesn’t give her the right to damage other’s homes. Especially since they have nothing to do with infrastructure decisions.

      • RattlerSix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 months ago

        But there’s a manhole cover in her yard, which is what she filled and doesn’t seem to be part of that easement. I doubt she will win in the end, and I hope she doesn’t, but I have a feeling that everyone in the neighborhood and the county officials have all talked to lawyers and if it were easy to say she did this illegally, it would have been said.

    • MrJameGumb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      She fixed a minor inconvenience for herself by creating a massive problem for the entire neighborhood. Now she has endangered everyone’s property and their safety. It doesn’t really matter if she’s technically “in the right” if every home around her is destroyed in a flood because of her actions.

    • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      The community should be angry at themselves and their leadership

      I think the article fairly clearly states that she appears to be in the wrong, but this is a civil matter and the courts are acting slowly.

      In June, the Shadowbay Club Homeowners’ Association filed a lawsuit asking a circuit court judge to order Diane Goglas to either immediately remove the concrete from the drainage pipe or replace it with a new pipe. As of Wednesday, Judge Donna Goerner had not yet scheduled a hearing on the request.

      An HOA can’t just have the cops sent in without a court order.

      • laughterlaughter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I don’t follow. Couldn’t you also claim the opposite as well? That neighbors are diverting water to her property?

        Edit: Nevermind. I read the article and yeah, the neighbors may have a case. But I’d like to know the full story.

    • SeattleRain@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      She doesn’t even claim the pipe is in her yard. She says that it’s causing erosion on her property.