• 8 Posts
  • 2.17K Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 6th, 2023

help-circle








  • I don’t think that the total number of “preferences being inflicted on others” is a constant. The more people leave each other alone, the fewer preferences are being inflicted (unless you count the preference against having preferences inflicted, which I suppose some people would). The electoral college isn’t inherently a libertarian institution, but it does at least keep the national government from acting with effectively no concern for the preferences of people who live in small states. (If only there was a way to protect the people in small states without giving them the outsized influence over the people in big states that the electoral college does…)



  • I talked to an older relative from the Soviet Union about gay marriage and she told me that on the one hand, it seems strange that something she had been raised to view as a mental illness was now getting official recognition, but on the other hand there were always people like the two nice guys she used to work with who were best friends, lived together, and never found the right women to marry…

    (She did work in a metallurgical plant but those guys were probably engineers rather than burly steelworkers.)


    She also said that she didn’t like the Chinese engineers sent to visit her plant because they smiled too much. A similar thing happened when my family came to the USA, before we got used to things here. I recall my mother being bothered that a cashier had smiled at her because the cashier didn’t know her and had no reason to be happy to see her.



  • I am of two minds about this.

    On the one hand, I am a deracinated individual. I live in a building with about a thousand other people, I don’t know any of them, and I don’t want to know any of them. I am only a little more connected to the city and state that I live in, because I don’t like the city and the state (whereas I simply don’t care about my neighbors in the building). Therefore, I am inclined to count people equally because

    communities of place, belief and walk of life

    simply don’t exist for me (at least not in the physical world).

    On the other hand, I hate being told what to do, and I especially hate it when someone far away feels that his principles entitle him to interfere in my business. The state-level fight for high-density zoning in California is a good example of this. Towns vote against permitting high-density zoning, but people far away who don’t know or care about the residents of those towns want to force the towns to permit that high-density zoning in order to accomplish the things that the people far away want in the abstract but the people living in those towns would actually have to suffer the consequences of. This perspective does lead me to feel that small areas where people with a minority opinion actually form the majority do need to be protected.

    I think the ideal solution would be to elect a president via a nationwide popular vote but also to make a deep commitment to libertarian principles of leaving people alone to live their lives as they see fit. (I expect that the latter is even less likely than the former.)



  • A robot isn’t just software: the hardware for humanoid robots has proved quite difficult to build and if these robots have the hardware necessary to walk around and manipulate objects (in the real world, not in a lab where they get multiple “takes”) then they are remarkable even if their every action is directed by a human.

    Also I would have guessed that Hasbro owned the IP for robots named “Optimus”. Maybe Tesla paid them, the way that Verizon paid Lucasfilm for the right to use the word “droid”.