• uzay@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    122
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    4 months ago

    Becoming an ad company while trying to put privacy first seems like a conflict of interests in the making

    • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      As Jamie Zawinski put it, it’s like a non-profit animal shelter setting up a sideline selling kitten meat to satisfy demands for hockey-stick growth. If somebody castigates them for it, they can point out that the demand for kitten deli slices didn’t going to go away, and if they didn’t sell them, someone else would step in and do it less humanely.

      • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        4 months ago

        There’s actually a real world example of this. Some cats that are disected in schools are euthanized cats from shelters, because the alternative is cat farms that breed cats just to be killed and disected

    • helenslunch@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s not, at all. When you drive by a billboard on the highway, is it invading your privacy? There’s no reason there can’t be a digital equivalent.

      • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        That’s what I always say. Targeted advertising should be illegal. Contextual advertising is acceptable.

        If I’m on the star trek wiki, serve me ads for star trek, sci-fi, and whatever. You don’t need to know anything about me specifically.

        We’d still need to do something about like ads that take up too much space, hurt page performance, or introduce malware, but removing the stalking would be an improvement

        • helenslunch@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          Right, and something like Reddit makes targeted advertising SUPER easy, with zero personal information.

          Want to know what kind of products I might be interested in? Literally just ask.

      • ms.lane@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        When you drive by a billboard on the highway, is it invading your privacy?

        Possibly?

        Let me rephrase it a little- When you walk past a digital advertising screen at a Westfield Shopping Centre - is it invading your privacy? (The answer is a definite YES, they have facial tracking and keep metrics on where you go in the mall, how long you loiter in certain locations, what stores you go, whether you came back out with bags, etc)

        • helenslunch@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          Once again, that is an issue with implementation, and not an issue inherent in advertising in general.

    • MurrayL@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s definitely making their job harder on the face of it, but it also differentiates them from other ad companies, so I guess they’re betting on that being a draw for potential clients.