• BigFig@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    5 months ago

    TLDR; Bowlero buys up local lanes and either closes them or renovates them into a new Bowlero. Then they cheap out at every expense, raise prices, and push expensive drinks and food.

    They’re clearly pushing for a monopoly like all these top big companies are doing.

    The article spends way too long telling you about “Big Mike” and trying to get you to sympathize with their characters instead of using real interviewees as an example.

    • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      5 months ago

      TLDR; Bowlero buys up local lanes and either closes them or renovates them into a new Bowlero. Then they cheap out at every expense, raise prices, and push expensive drinks and food.

      That’s private equity for you.

    • Flying_Hellfish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      They just bought up the largest waterpark in Illinois… yep, a waterpark.

      The last article I read on it said they had big ideas to increase profit at the waterpark and it was something the old owners never thought of, which is to start selling alcohol. I can’t imagine how much a watered down margarita at a waterpark is going to cost.

      • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        5 months ago

        Pretty sure the previous owners didn’t sell alcohol to avoid drunk situations around drowning hazards and children.

      • MagicShel@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        5 months ago

        You can’t imagine how excited I am to take my kids to a water park for a bunch of drunken 30 year olds to hit on them or loudly brag about fucking Lois in HR in graphic detail or whatever else sober people keep to themselves when they are around kids.

    • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      No, Private Equity makes things worse by definition. The incentives of a PE firm are misaligned with building a healthy business that builds consumer trust and treats employees well - if your company is acquired by PE you can expect worse working conditions, tighter deadlines or metrics, worse compensation… and having to deal with much angrier clients.

      • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        You know, the funny thing is that nominally, the point of PE is to take a struggling asset, get it back on its feet, and sell it for more than you bought it for. It’s flipping for businesses. That honestly doesn’t sound bad, it sounds like probably a good thing when you put it like that. IRL, though, it just ends up being vulture capital all the way down.

        • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yea, I’d saying that a company seeking outside investors or trying to bring on managers or consultants… these aren’t inherently bad things - it’s just that in practice it’s fucking awful.

          In our modern capitalist system the flow diagram is basically: team/founder starts a company, company does well and builds a customer base, team/founder cash out, PE/profit targets force under investment in company health, company gets worse, new team/founder outcompetes… though a huge problem at the moment is that having a billion dollar slush fund can really draw out being outcompeted i.e. Uber/literally anything in silicon valley.

  • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Another industry becoming enshitified. I really wish there was something we, the people, could do about this, because this really fucking sucks. Average people won’t care though, because shiny.

    • Jode@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I Dunno man I think this is really one where just not going to bowlero would do the trick. Maybe it’s different because I’m in the midwest, but there are plenty of places way better and cheaper than bowlero and I think the local populous knows. Because the bowlero by me is only ever full if a company is doing an event there. Otherwise the general consensus is “wtf no I don’t want to go to the loud dark bowling alley with 9 dollar drinks and microwave wings”

      • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        5 months ago

        Sure, but the article was saying they’re on an acquisition frenzy, scooping up any and every alley they can. Most smaller cities only have maybe one alley is the point, where Bowlero has an effective monopoly.

        • Jode@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          Well let’s hope this ticketmaster shit the government is doing has knock on effects

          • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            I’m with ya. At the same time, we really need some systemic changes to stop Wall Street’s penchant for fucking everything up.

      • TechNerdWizard42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        But you will, because the rest will close eventually. It’s a long game. The mom and pops won’t survive forever.

      • eatfudd@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Almost every single bowling alley near me is either bowlero, bowl america, or amf bowling. They’re all owned by bowlero. It sucks