• stravanasu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Title:

    ChatGPT broke the Turing test

    Content:

    Other researchers agree that GPT-4 and other LLMs would probably now pass the popular conception of the Turing test. […]

    researchers […] reported that more than 1.5 million people had played their online game based on the Turing test. Players were assigned to chat for two minutes, either to another player or to an LLM-powered bot that the researchers had prompted to behave like a person. The players correctly identified bots just 60% of the time

    Complete contradiction. Trash Nature, it’s become only an extremely expensive gossip science magazine.

    PS: The Turing test involves comparing a bot with a human (not knowing which is which). So if more and more bots pass the test, this can be the result either of an increase in the bots’ Artificial Intelligence, or of an increase in humans’ Natural Stupidity.

    • aksdb@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      So if more and more bots pass the test, this can be the result either of an increase in the bots’ Artificial Intelligence, or of an increase in humans’ Natural Stupidity.

      Or it “simply” plays with human biases, which are very natural. Stuff like seeing faces in everything that somewhat resembles two eyes and a mouth (or sometimes just the eyes and a head like shape etc.) is pretty hard wired. We have similar biases in regards to language. If something reads like it was written by a human, we immediately sympathize with it. Which is also the reason these LLMs are so successful and cause so many people to fear our AI overlords are right around the corner. Simply because the language is good we go into “damn, that’s like a human”-mode.

      • stravanasu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Agree (you made me think of the famous face on Mars). I mean that more as a joke. Also there’s no clear threshold or divide on one side of which we can speak of “human intelligence”. There’s a whole range from impairing disabilities to Einstein and Euler – if it really makes sense to use a linear 1D scale, which very probably doesn’t.

    • HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Also, the Turing Test isn’t some holy grail of AI. It’s just a thought experiment, and not even the highest test for an AI that we can think of. Passing it is impressive don’t get me wrong, but unlike what clickbait articles would tell you, it does not automatically mean an AI is sentient or is smarter than humans or anything like that. It means it passed the thought experiment, nothing more.

      Also also, ChatGPT was not the first AI to pass the Turing Test. Actually, plenty have, even over a decade before.