Observe Israel definitely not being an Apartheid state.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    105
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Biden is older than Israel, he was 6 when it was created, and he has said he will always support them no matter what because when he was a child his father made him promise to.

    Elderly people often don’t realize how much has changed. In Biden’s eyes Israel will always be the victims because of WW2.

    For him to accept that was generations ago and lots has changed, he’d have to come to terms with how old he is.

    And if he could do that, he wouldn’t be trying to increase his record for oldest president ever.

      • sparkle@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        This is how a majority of extremely old people think. To them, what was true in their childhood is always true.

        • atro_city@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          27
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Otherwise put: conservatives - just want everything to the stay the same.

          • sparkle@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            8 months ago

            Yep, even a lot of people who were progressives in their time period end up thinking this way. Like Ruth Bader.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          It’s not like their choosing to do that.

          It’s a normal thing our brains do if we’re lucky enough to live that long.

          Humans didn’t evolve to live in such fast pace worlds. So if someone made it to 60, running on “autopilot” wasn’t as big of a deal. So as we lose critical thinking skills (again, completely normal) we fall back on stuff we learned as kids and stereotypes to be able to keep up.

          It’s why not having an age limit on elected representives is so crazy.

          It’s outright denial of science to pretend an 80 year old is still capable of leading a country. For more reasons than just that one.

          • eleventy_7@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            I don’t think this applies to all 80 year olds though. Some of the smartest, most open-minded people I’ve met have been 70+ year old university professors. These are the kind of people who retired, and then came back to teach because they were bored. It’s definitely possible for humans to retain their critical thinking well into that late stage of life, but I’ll grant you that most who make it to that age don’t seem to manage it.

            I can only hope that if and when I reach that many decades on this planet, I’ll still have the kind of clarity of mind to not get stuck on ‘autopilot’…

            • givesomefucks@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              Sure, Roger Penrose is a decade older, and he’s probably the most intelligent living person

              But a professor working out a few more tweaks to their life’s work is not the peak of their career. And the mental abilities for that is not reacting to a million shitty things at once as the president of America.

              It’s kind of high stressed.

              The standards are just that much lower for elderly teachers too, and if they’re actually intelligent then they’d freely admit that their age is a negative.

              That’s just biology, there’s no way around it. No one peaks at 70 years old…

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        Your mistake is thinking everyone that does a shitty thing, did it for the same reason:

        That they’re a monster.

        That way of thinking is easy, but the “why” is the most important part if you’re trying to prevent the next person from doing the same thing.

        I’m not making excuses, I’m explaining the “why” and hoping some day we have a choice for president whose able to make rational decisions.

        Fingers crossed for 2028.

        • index@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          I doubt the reason “why” the west is supporting a genocide is a promise the current ceo of usa made as a child, especially given that the same policy has been going on for a century. I also doubt it has much to do with them being old since again the same war policies have been applied for a century.

          • qwerty@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            True. As an outsider to US politics, it painfully obvious to me that the only difference between DEM and GOP is rhetoric, but when it comes to action, they all do the same thing.

            EU politics is no different. It doesn’t matter what the people want, “democratically elected leaders” will do what they want, or rather what they are told to do, regardless of what the people think.

            • WldFyre@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              it painfully obvious to me that the only difference between DEM and GOP is rhetoric, but when it comes to action, they all do the same thing.

              Sure, that’s why living conditions and human rights are so much better in Dem states than in Rep states lol come on now

              • Liz@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                8 months ago

                BoTh SidEs ArE tHe SaMe!

                Aside from one party trying to make being trans illegal, or trying to make pollution legal, or trying to cheat at elections, or ignoring global warming, or make abortion illegal, or crushing unions, or trying to defund Ukraine, or trying to teach creationism…

                Do the Democrats have policy and action problems? Absolutely. Are they the same as the Republicans? Of course not.

                • index@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Both red and blue parties are ruled by corrupted criminals with blood on their hands and that’s enough not to want to vote for any of them.

                  Human rights have never been a US government priority, look at the war crimes they committed around the world and how they are supporting a genocide right now or look at their support for evil corporations and how little they care about poor people.

                  USA army is one of the biggest polluter in the world and the government has 0 plans to shut it down. The government has always been linked and tied to polluting companies.

                  The government has always cheat at elections, see how much money they spend on propaganda, mass surveillance and how they have a tight grip on media.

                  Ukrainian government is an authoritarian regime now seeking to repatriate these who fleed the country to force them to fight.

      • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Yes. And it accomplished its mission in 1948 with the creation of Israel, and the state’s continued existence.

        The deluded Zionist sub-groups want ‘back’ Transjordan and the rest of Palestine - ignoring the political reality that doing so means war with and annexation of parts of Jordan and Lebanon, all of Palestine and parts of Egypt too.

    • morrowind@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      I like to think biden has, to a good extent. From what I’m seeing in the news, his administration is internally pushing a lot harder on israel than they show externally. Of course he still sends billions through, maybe I’m just projecting