What is it with Nike and sexualized athletic uniforms these days (see MBA see-through pants)? Did PornHub invest without anyone noticing?

  • ChokingHazard63@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    123
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Maybe my ad blocker is working double time but how is there not a picture of the proposed outfit in the article?!?

    Here you go

    • strawberry@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      95
      ·
      7 months ago

      fuck is that supposed to cover? half a coochie lol. one misstep and the cats out of the bag lol

      • Habahnow@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        55
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        The deviant in me likes it, but man I don’t think women should have to wear stuff like this to work if they don’t want to.

        • lolrightythen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          I don’t know how to be completely proper without diminishing the meaning of my statement all the time, but I agree with this statement’s substance and structure. I hope people can take comments like this without feeling degraded.

          Nobody should be forced to wear a uniform that diminishes their hard work and achievements that earned them the required uniform. Olympians are going to want high performance garb - generally tight-fitting and light weight. That doesn’t mean the team organizers should go hog wild on showing skin to boost ratings. It’s impressive, inspiring, and (for me) a bit depressing to see the peak human form without being creepy, but these folks have worked far too hard to be objectified.

          But if they’re down, I’m down

          *Edited afterthought: Do NCAA gymnasts have uniform issues? I don’t see their competitions often, but they tend to stay in place to my knowledge. I’m not trying to argue for the new uniforms - it just seems like those uniforms would be a relevant case study.

        • Clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          7 months ago

          It means to say something that can’t be unsaid, usually in the context of blabbing a secret. The origin is from the British Royal Navy in the age of sail. The “cat” is a Cat’o’ nine-tails a type of whip used for punishment. It was stored in a velvet bag, and once it came out there was no going back, it was going to be used on you.

    • Neato@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      So the tops are nearly identical. But women clearly need massive lower ventilation…or something.

      Yeah this just shows Nike is being sexist as fuck. Swap these suits by gender and let’s see what happens.

    • stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      7 months ago

      That is absolutely degrading, why is it impossible to give women similar kinds of shorts as men gets?

      • Not_mikey@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        There is a shorts option for women as well, you can see it on the far right in the picture in the article.

        Sucks for women who do usually like wearing briefs but they aren’t being forced to wear this.

      • RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Women’s butt muscles move differently than men’s do. So they need a higher cut to compensate for that.

        ;p

        • stoy@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Sure women’s anatomy is slightly different, but there are other ways to deal with that other than to just give them one tiny crotch strap.

    • ditty@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 months ago

      I am pretty aghast at how revealing that track outfit is. It’s already bad enough how short women’s running shorts are compared to mens; if you have even slightly thicker thighs they can chafe pretty badly!

  • Atelopus-zeteki@kbin.run
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    117
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Not as much fun as the title, and more to the point: Lauren Fleshman, the US national champion in the 5000m in 2006 and 2010, shared even harsher criticism in an Instagram post, writing: “I’m sorry, but show me one WNBA or NWSL team who would enthusiastically support this kit. This is for Olympic Track and Field. Professional athletes should be able to compete without dedicating brain space to constant pube vigilance or the mental gymnastics of having every vulnerable piece of your body on display. Women’s kits should be in service to performance, mentally and physically. If this outfit was truly beneficial to physical performance, men would wear it.” She added: “This is not an elite athletic kit for track and field. This is a costume born of patriarchal forces that are no longer welcome or needed to get eyes on women’s sports. … Stop making it harder for half the population @nike @teamusa @usatf.”

    • FraidyBear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 months ago

      I have no idea if that’s a legit response BUT in the event that it is, that uniform in the pick is not the same as what they have for this next round. This is it, and it is way way way unacceptable. I used to have lingerie undies like this and I hated them, I called it the labia splitter.

      • jonasw@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        IIUC in the screenshot she posted, she mentioned the mannequins you just posted. So she is talking about this uniform

  • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    They do it because ultimately, they get away with it. I understand athletes have worked their asses off to get to compete (especially in the Olympics), but at some point if they genuinely want change, they need to take a stand — either wear something less revealing, or boycott their events. Get enough people to do it, and maybe it’ll send the message.

      • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Hey, some of us are only tolerant of degredation! /s

        Though really, my only problem is this isn’t what the athletes want (well, and the slew of other peoblems this situation is indicative of). I think it’d be hilarious if athletes could go traditional all the way to the nude. No sharkskin swimming suits, no state of the art track shoes, nada.

        Maybe then they’d stop breaking records every year just for getting technological assistance…

        Then we can make an “enhanced” Olympics with steroids and fancy suits and the works, and REALLY see what humans can do on their own with the juxtaposition.

    • GroundedGator@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      I hear Nike calls this their emperor line. They told the athletes it’s ultra lightweight performance wear. It doesn’t actually exist.

  • stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    7 months ago

    It’s all there’s left to do for the rich. They turn to their vices and indulge deeper and deeper, worse and worse.

    What’s left to do when everyone sucks you off all the time and you can buy whatever else you want.

    Affluenza is a cancer.

  • BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Great, now viewing the Olympics will be banned in Texas with the governor’s war on porn with “christian” values.

  • maculata@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I glad to hear the use of the scientifically accurate term “Hoo Haa” to describe the aforementioned thingy.

  • No1@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Can they wear some sort of bike shorts or compression shorts/half tights under it?

    That would at least cover their hoo haa properly…

    • Not_mikey@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      They can and theres is also a shorts option for women as well, you can see it on the far right in the picture in the article.

  • Not_mikey@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    As sus as the leotard is it’s optional and they do have an option with shorts if they don’t want to worry about accidentally exposing the entire world.

    Don’t really see a problem with it since there are other options. If you wanna show your new Brazilian to the world, you do you.

  • JoYo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    why wouldn’t they use the other kits that aren’t skimpy? there’s all the rest of them.