In the last years, I have seen plenty of users telling or promoting certain ultra-permissive rules as part of Open Source but which are not even in the definition like the use of read-only licenses, being a good example the MEGA software.

However, I didn’t find exact source of these ideas and only believed in the misinformation of certain videos in *tube or similar.

Today, I was looking for a FLOSS VPN client to use at home as I use MATE DE and found Printunl Client promoted as Open Source. Or that was everything until I read the license.

  • Ephera@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 years ago

    Yeah, but it’s fine, because
    Microsoft ❤️ [making money off of] Open-Source.