• TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    108
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    Very fitting headline in a day and age where I’m constantly seeing people advocating for giving trump the Whitehouse and finishing the country off because anything less would be SuPpOrTiNg GeNoCiDe. As if the move to help Palestinians would be to elect Trump. These people are very stupid children, bots, or Russian paid actors. Impossible to know which.

    • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Russian paid actors.

      I got into that exact argument about Biden. Eventually I called the person a Putin puppet and got my post deleted by a Lemmy.world mod.

      • Aqarius@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        So, you got into an argument, turned to insults, and moderation kicked in. Sounds like everything is working OK.

        • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re exactly right, and you proved your own point with this comment thread. It’s really sad that people can’t be polite and think they have to resort to ad hominem crap.

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sounds overzealous to me. Wrapped up in that is the assumption that associating a person with Putin is said as just a way to hurt feelings, rather than a perhaps-assuming claim… before yesterday, it never once occurred to me that a mod would have an issue with a claim of association that cannot be proven either way. Might as well start banning people for telling each other they’re wrong.

          • Aqarius@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Wrapped up in that is the assumption that associating a person with Putin is said as just a way to hurt feelings, rather than a perhaps-assuming claim… before yesterday, it never once occurred to me that a mod would have an issue with a claim of association that cannot be proven either way. Might as well start banning people for telling each other they’re wrong.

            So, if I were to hit you with a claim of association that cannot be proven either way, but just so happens to conveniently dismiss anything you said, and anything you might say in response, you wouldn’t consider that a personal attack?

            Fine by me: How much is Putin paying you to sow bad-faith arguments among non-republicans?

            • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I am frequently hit with much worse “attacks” than this and I laugh at and ignore the vast majority of them. Even when someone’s particularly good at being personally insulting (this example is NOT) I rarely get hurt by it.

              • Aqarius@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Ah, so you do, in fact, recognize it as an attack, a personally insulting one, with the intention “to hurt feelings”, and not a “perhaps-assuming claim” you present it when trying to justify not getting banned for being an asshole.

                • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  recognize it as an attack, a personally insulting one, with the intention “to hurt feelings”,

                  Precisely what I strongly dispute. It’s only an insult if you have no idea what an actual insult is.

                  trying to justify not getting banned for being an asshole.

                  Kinda ironic that you did not even read the conversation, and you get to call me an asshole in the same breath as telling me I was insulting, which again since you didn’t read the conversation you’re pulling that assumption straight from your rectum anyhow.

                  • Aqarius@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    It’s only an insult if you have no idea what an actual insult is.

                    This is only an argument if you have no idea what an actual argument is.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Annnnd I was banned from politics on lemmy.world. this is actually kind of messed up. I don’t think I said anything particularly offensive even. It seems like it was more about my message.

        • EdibleFriend@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I was banned from all of . world for shit posting in a running group by saying I’m too fat to run. The group crossed my feed when I was sorting by all and I said it just for shits and giggles.

          That got me banned but when I went on the discord and asked about this another mod came along and reversed it.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        The “automod” just removed 5 of my comments for complete bullshit reasons, but it honestly does seem like they did it in response to the exact same issue – I claimed someone is a russian actor. I’m now wondering who runs lemmy.world, and what exact agenda they have.

        Despite it claiming “automod” there were human-written reasons, one of which was “Provide evidence of shilling or this is personal insult.”

        • Might Be@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You do realize I read Lemmy right?

          No, they were reported multiple times, and I removed them by hand, no bots were involved.

          Like I said in the modlog, if you have actual evidence of botting, let’s see it, otherwise, you are intentionally antagonizing people, and I can’t let you do that.

          • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            It seems like you assume I know a lot of things I either don’t know or forgot about. Forgot about the modlog, still even looking there, it’s missing detail, such as someone to message to ask a question. Also, … “abelist insults”, really? I believe I wrote a couple things like “what is wrong with your brain?” which would not be taken as seriously by anyone I know.

            I did see the message about providing evidence of shilling… I am just curious what would constitute such evidence? In my experience you could almost never prove it, and ironically that is what the parent post above is literally about.

            • Might Be@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              It seems like you assume I know a lot of things I either don’t know or forgot about.

              You admit that you have no evidence at all, and you are going around calling people who disagree with you “Russian bots”?

              Suspicious voting patterns, repetitive spam messages, all of these would constitute as evidence, and our admins ban these spam bots usually within minutes.

              "what is wrong with your brain?” which would not be taken as seriously by anyone I know.

              You are going around and calling people stupid," it’s just a joke bro" is not going to cut it. Ironic prejudice is still prejudice.

              I don’t want to argue with you more. Take the next 3 days off, talk about something else, think about how you can contribute positively before you come back.

              • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                You admit that you have no evidence at all, and you are going around calling people who disagree with you “Russian bots”?

                No I didn’t, to any of this.

                Ironic prejudice is still prejudice.

                Uh, wow. No prejudice involved.

                I don’t want to argue with you more

                News to me this was an argument as the first contradiction just occurred

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      A child often behaves like an LLM-based bot - a child too often will imitate proper argumentation in style, but say junk, because they want to “win” an argument and not be correct. I would do that when I was a child.

      I mean, adults do that too all the time, so the only way to distinguish bots from people is to communicate with people you know are real or others know are real.

      I love how the old way of using the Web would solve this problem automatically, and P2P solutions with webs of trust too, but the majority of people uses the architecture most advantageous to bots.

      Almost as if you needed bots to attract the majority of people. They wouldn’t come to the web otherwise, for just real people and real communities. It’s like a hunter’s whistle. Or like porn.

        • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I know some people that certainly seem to think I have to like him to vote for him. They genuinely think I’m going to sit out an election that could have a wannabe dictator on the ballot.

          • BoastfulDaedra@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You know who thinks we have to idolize a guy to let him run our country? Russians and bots made by Russians… it’s literally all they’ve ever known. After that, people who fall for propaganda.

            • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              This guy is an irl friend of an irl friend. He gets absolutely mental if you post a quote or news article about something Biden did that unpopular. Recently, I posted about how I’m depressed about the next election and he went into a spiel about how it’s our civic duty to vote and how Biden is the only thing keeping use from falling into a dictatorship. I mean, sure, but I’m still depressed that he’s our best option. Honestly, the way he talks about Biden reminds me of Trump supporters. Ever hear someone call Biden “Uncle Joe” unironically?

        • Aceticon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Millions are supposed to swallow their Principles and vote for this one man, when the by far simplest, easiest solution to “keep Trump out” is for this single man to change his actions.

          Clearly for Joe Biden keeping Trump out is secondary to “I should be able to do whatever I want”, the very opposite of “I am but the elected representative of the will of the voters”.

            • Aceticon@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              The theory of Representative Democracy is for those elected to represent those who voted for them.

              However the reality is indeed different, the less democratic the country the worse. I’m just pointing out the US is already de facto way down towards the Dictatorship side of things when the current POTUS prefers to keep materially supporting a racist genocidal massacre over doing what millions of those who voted for him demand as a question of Principle (we’re not talking about disagreements over what to do for the Economy here, we’re talking about outright support with bombs to those committing what is already the largest genocide of the century).

              I wonder if there trully is any significant distance between Biden and Trump in terms of democratic principles. Maybe their loudness and the openness of the methods they use to subvert Democracy is their main difference in this, not their spirit as (non-)representatives of their voters, since they both behave as masters whose will is more important than everything else including some of the most important things for those who elected them: they behave as kings or dictators, not as elected representatives.

              • acceptable_pumpkin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                “I wonder if there trully is any significant distance between Biden and Trump in terms of democratic principles.”

                Are you serious? What a completely naive and ignorant take. Gee, I wonder if there’s much difference between Biden and a man who LITERALLY tried to overthrow the government and has stated, quite clearly, his desire to be a dictator.

                I don’t understand your “logic” at all here.

                • Aceticon@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  When in a Circus, the out of control clown might be the one getting your attention but its the quiet pickpockets working the crowd that are doing most of the damage.

                  Trump and Biden both couldn’t care less about the what the people who voted for them want, it’s just that one is a loudmouth and uses overt means to try to subvert Democracy whilst the other one is quieter and does his subversion of Democracy via campaign contributions, appeals to negative vote, not fullfilling that which he promises in the campaign trail undemocratic primaries and so on.

                  Ultimatelly in both cases those who vote for either of them end up not being represented at all.

                  One could say that Trump-style subversion of Democracy has actually been less successful that the style practiced by Biden, mainly because Trump is so spectacularly incompetent. In fact plenty of less loud and more sneaky Republicans who practice the same style as Biden are probably much more dangerous.

                  Whilst I myself would also tend to see Trump as the most dangerous, in light of just how confident Biden is that he can do whatever he wants without being punished by voters, I’m starting to ponder on “what does he know which I don’t” and if I and most people haven’t been foolled into seeing the loudmouth as much more dangerous when the quiet one is also dangerous.

                  Granted, I’m an outsider, don’t even live in the US, and don’t really have to make a choice between swallowing my principles and vote for the quieter Nazi-lover to keep out the loud Nazi-lover or not vote at all.

                  The closest I’ve been to that situation was when I lived in the UK, were I ended up joining the Greenparty - even though I could only vote in Local and EU elections and it’s a very small party - and just helped them out with campaigning.

                • Aceticon@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  There are way more political positions in genuinelly Democratic countries than merelly 2.

                  If you assume that if I’m not for #A then I must be for #B, then you’re just betraying your profound ignorance of Politics under Democracy.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean, that’s fine. I only have a problem with people who will watch the world burn under the guise of principles

        • seahorse [Ohio]@midwest.socialM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          But if biden loses I’m going to blame HIM, not the voters. We all know how dangerous trump is. If biden and other mainstream dems actually believed it they’d be pushing boundaries like never before. But they’re not. They’re actually moving further right to try and appease “centrists” which is pretty much what the social democrats did in Germany in the 30s and we see how well that worked out. They should be promoting the organizing of militias in case trump supporters try to fuck around and seize power again if democracy really is on the line.

    • spacesatan@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why am I unsurprised that its lemmy.world libs bringing the ‘everyone I don’t like is a russian bot’ line to the fediverse.

    • Marin_Rider@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      lemmy despite trying not to be like reddit, it’s still moderated by people that get off on the power trip exactly the same

        • redfellow@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Yeah exactly. What’s weird is my ban was reversed in lemmy.world/c/politics. I have no idea why but I sense weird behind the scenes drama

          They don’t care that much.

    • Verdant Banana@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      vote biden because trump bad

      what about their resumes? what have either candidates done that has benefited your life enough directly that demands your vote?

      please name one thing biden has done that your life now is better for

      was it the cannabis reforms he promised and flip flopped on with prosecutor harris? was it the police reforms he promised? was it defending our human rights? was it the immigration policies he talked up that now mirror republican strategies? or is that stagnant paycheck after biden promised a higher minimum wage of $15 which is still too low due to the inflation?

      forgot he can not do anything because republicans and republicans never can do anything either because democrats

      through policies and laws crafted and put in place by politicians like biden, trump, obama, and the list goes on my right to vote was taken so not like have a say in this election anyways

      https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/trumpometer/

      https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/biden-promise-tracker/?ruling=true

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not that those links would be the metric to go by when voting, but they do not support your position as Biden’s stats are much better there.

        I will not waste any more time on you so don’t bother replying

        • aStonedSanta@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah. I had to look at both twice to make sure and laughed a bit. Some people can site sources. But they can’t read em