FediTips (@[email protected])
mstdn.social
Content warning: Please don't use Lemmy :( Human rights, oppression

Please don’t put any hate comments against the developers of lemmy or against the person who posted this.

I am also unhappy about what the main lemmy instance is doing.

What are your thoughts?

  • gaurniad_angel@lemmy.ml
    1·
    3 years ago

    No they say there is insufficient evidence to prove genocide, I can’t be bothered to repeat myself any further.

    I was using language symmetric to the parent comment as a rhetorical tool.

    Thank you for this, I am going to take this as an admission that your initial statement was fallacious rather than a semantic error.

      • gaurniad_angel@lemmy.ml
        1·
        3 years ago

        here’s what I have:

         adj.
Containing or based on a fallacy.
adj.
Tending to mislead; deceptive.
Pertaining to, of the nature of, or embodying fallacy; deceptively erroneous or misleading.
        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
          42·
          3 years ago

          There is no fallacy here. US state department states that the evidence to support the claim does not exist. The fallacy is trying to turn that into something that it’s not. We’ve literally gone over this for days, and the fact that you still can’t understand that makes me think that we’re not going to get anywhere. Have a good day.

          • gaurniad_angel@lemmy.ml
            1·
            3 years ago

            The fallacy I refer to is your initial statement as to their denial of genocide. You stated it occurred when no such denial took place. When I say fallacious: I refer to this initial statement that you made as a rhetorical tool - in my view fallaciously.

            Thank you for remaining patient and civil, also have a good day.