I’ve seen that some instances have already done it preemptively.

  • YurkshireLad
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    Federation with Meta would significantly increase network traffic and storage costs?

    • IninewCrow
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Then Meta would help everyone cope with the extra workload … then help some more with a few changes … then offer some new features … then help with increased usage … then offer more features … then push out the smaller instances and take over everything … then wall off ActivityPub … then start charging people and advertisers … then make billions … then watch users rebel and start a new system and repeat it all again in 10 or 20 years.

      • Xanvial@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        ActivityPub is maintained by W3C not mastodon, or lemmy, or other fediverse system. Meta doesn’t need federation to push W3C to do what they want

    • zaphod
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Pretty sure it’d only increase traffic if folks on a fediverse server followed someone on Threads. So unless there’s a sudden gigantic flux of fediverse users following Threads users, it shouldn’t have a huge near term impact.