• Victor Villas
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    But which part of that document gives the impression that the idea is to bring people in “to make numbers go up” without much planning? The fact that it doesn’t talk about housing? I think it’s kind of expected to carve out given the scope of the report.

    • MajorMajormajormajor
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Copied from my comment above:

      "to run some numbers, BC currently has 5,000,879 out of Canada’s 36,991,981 or 13.5% of the population. If that proportion continues over the next decade, BC will see an approximate increase of 600,750 out of 4,450,000 people based off of this plan (assuming the grown maintains its linear growth). If you divide 600,750 people by 293,000 new units you get 2.05 people per unit, therefore if the people immigrating are bringing their family and living more than 2 people per unit you will see a net surplus of housing, but single people will see a net loss or break even of housing.

      All of this is to say, it appears they have planned to create enough housing for the people projected to come here, but not a substantial amount to increase the overall supply. It would appear it will maintain the status quo."

      If they build all the housing they plan to, they will roughly keep pace with immigration. Therefore nothing will change for the better, or our current housing crisis will remain constant.

      That is assuming they follow through with the promise to build that much.

      • Victor Villas
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        A reasonable guesstimate. I don’t see how that answers my question, though.