@RandAlThor to World [email protected] • 6 months agoRichest 1% account for more carbon emissions than poorest 66%, report sayswww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square44arrow-up1416arrow-down111cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1405arrow-down1external-linkRichest 1% account for more carbon emissions than poorest 66%, report sayswww.theguardian.com@RandAlThor to World [email protected] • 6 months agomessage-square44cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-squareDizzy Devil DuckylinkfedilinkEnglish2•6 months agoLess kids means less money spent and more money saved in the long run, so yeah.
Less kids means less money spent and more money saved in the long run, so yeah.
So kids have négative value?
Depending on who you ask, yes.