@RandAlThor to World [email protected] • 6 months agoRichest 1% account for more carbon emissions than poorest 66%, report sayswww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square44arrow-up1416arrow-down111cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1405arrow-down1external-linkRichest 1% account for more carbon emissions than poorest 66%, report sayswww.theguardian.com@RandAlThor to World [email protected] • 6 months agomessage-square44cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-squareDizzy Devil DuckylinkfedilinkEnglish2•6 months agoLess kids means less money spent and more money saved in the long run, so yeah.
Not having kids affects how rich you are ?
Less kids means less money spent and more money saved in the long run, so yeah.
So kids have négative value?
Depending on who you ask, yes.