The vaccines are obviously safe, but can someone explain 2021 data from openvaers?
Or maybe we should ignore data in the interest of science.
The vaccines are obviously safe, but can someone explain 2021 data from openvaers?
Or maybe we should ignore data in the interest of science.
Yes the novel messenger RNA vaccines cause heart inflamation and sometimes death. This is well established by now.
Most people see covid 19 as a big threat (presidents were not laughed at when they called it a war) so they don’t care about a few people being dying as part of the battle.
From what I can tell, myocarditis is not deadly if treated. Also, COVID-19 can cause myocarditis, so refusing to be vaccinated over that possibility could likely lead you down the same path anyway.
It’s a risk worth taking with the threat of COVID.
People have fallen down the stairs and died while going to the bunker during a bombardment.
Ignoring the data is a risk worth taking?
That’s not what I said. You have one datapoint here. What claims are you making anyways? That the vaccine is very deadly?
I have linked the complete available dataset of one possibly fatal side effect of vaccines administered in USA. If you are treating one year’s data as one datapoint, the same vocabulary must be applied to data about efficacy of vaccines : one year’s data is just one datapoint.
What I am claiming here is that there is adverse data available, and even if we want to dismiss vaccines as a cause, that data needs explaining.
I would be interested in an explanation as well. I just haven’t seen any