A better option to treating the opioid crisis is to help those in need now … rather than waiting to see how their suffering will affect them and society as a whole.

The costs are always the same … either be a conservative and villainize these people and let them become a burden on society and costs go towards police, security, emergency health care, judicial and negative social effects from their destroyed lives

… or …

Be more socially minded and spend the funds on helping these people now and prevent them from spiralling out of control and negatively affecting their lives further or the lives of others.

  • Vex_Detrause
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Prevention and risk reduction is always cheaper than cures or damage control.

    • IninewCrowOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      The problem always seems to be that government and those in power always view these issues from an economic and financial perspective … rather than as a humanitarian issue that just requires us to take care of one another.

      • socialjusticewizard@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ironically though, almost every time the humanitarian approach is more economical.

        It’s more expensive to police people than to help them. It’s more expensive to clean up around a homeless camp and deal with all the fallout than it is to house them. It’s more expensive to handle the repercussions of ignoring everyone’s health than to treat them.

        Most of the time, when you cut to the quick of why people don’t want to fund something like OAT, you tend to get a response that basically boils down to wanting bad behaviour to be punished.

        • enragedchowder
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Exactly, I WISH the government would view these issues from an economic perspective, because that would mean actually helping these people and integrating them back into society

        • someguy3
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          You forgot the most obvious that homeless drug addicted people are not employed and paying taxes. It’s a double whammy.

      • heyheyitsbrent
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, and seemingly only looking as far ahead as the next election, not what is best for society in the next 20 years.

        • IninewCrowOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          We simultaneously want everything right now with no waiting … and believe that we will also live forever.