• Steeve
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    deleted by creator

    • Afghaniscran@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I kind of agree but if an incident happens on a site where the shooter wasn’t paying attention to training and never attended the initial safety briefing then that’s their own problem.

      Working in construction, if I never turned up to a health and safety briefing ( and let me tell you they’re repetitive as fuck) and something went wrong but my excuse was “I didn’t need to go cos I’ve been to these before” it wouldn’t go in my favour whatsoever. I don’t think it’s a reasonable excuse either. If there’s potential for lives to be at stake, you should be paying attention. At the very least, even if not for other people’s lives, just go so you can say you listened and followed every instruction but the mistake still happened. That way youve covered your own back.

      • Steeve
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        deleted by creator

    • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      As a construction worker or an engineer, you need to take a safety training for each new construction site you go on, even if it’s your 40th worksite. So I feel like it’s not so hard to pin Baldwin for not taking the hour course properly.

    • beetus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Yeah he blew off this years mandatory training, but he showed up to last years training, it can’t be his fault!”.

      Idk that doesn’t really seem like a valid excuse

      • Steeve
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        deleted by creator

        • bric@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          He has both criminal and civil charges being brought against him though, and the civil charges have a much lower standard. He might not be charged with manslaughter, but still be liable as the one at fault

    • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      But if he has so much experience with guns on movie sets, then he knows how to property handle firearms safely, and if he followed proper gun safety he wouldn’t have shot anyone