

That sub was always prone to lengthy back and forths with mods because their standards are set essentially barely below what a masters or PhD student could be expected to produce.
It’s worth it, because it was/is the single best sub for finding both bredth and depth of information. Them insisting on high standards is what made it worth going to.
But holy Hannah, it does make it difficult to contribute with niche interests if you don’t already have some degree of knowledge about how historiography is done. My background was nothing near that, and I had no interest in spending a week or more doing edits until I got everything up to snuff the one time I ran across a question I could answer.
I did try a couple of times, but the kind of research and reporting I’d done was always more casual, with next to zero need to cite much of anything beyond a quick note.
My steam ran out after maybe the third attempt to get things up to standard. Never actually made the comment, because I respected their standards and didn’t want to give them extra work removing unacceptable comments when it was easier to just message a draft.
Which, I kinda think they might be better off implementing that as their default, if there’s a way to make it manageable. It would be way less hassle for users too.
Since there are other subs with less stringent requirements for history questions, I’m glad there’s a place online that average folks can interact with experts at a high standard.
But dayum, I can imagine the chaos and annoyance on your end lol.
GICEtapo