archive.is
archive.is

As much as I agree with these two contrarians, I believe Trudeau was within his rights to prorogue. The proroguation is clearly just to run the Liberal leadership race, but sadly the PM is allowed to do that.

[David MacKinnon and Aris Lavranos] argued Trudeau’s decision effectively denies Parliament, without reasonable justification, the ability to carry out its constitutional functions as a legislature.

In particular, the application said, prorogation prevents Parliament from dealing “quickly and decisively” with especially pressing issues, including the effects of Trump’s threatened tariffs.

They suggest the true intention of prorogation was to stymie efforts of opposition parties to bring a motion of non-confidence in the Liberal government.

Original: https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-judge-agrees-to-expedite-legal-challenge-of-trudeaus-move-to-prorogue/

  • acargitz
    20·
    2 days ago

    It was a shitty move when Harper did it, it is shitty when Trudeau does it. If the rules allow it, we should change the rules.

    • HellsBelle@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      18·
      2 days ago

      Harper did it to save his own ass … twice: in 2008 to avoid a non-confidence vote and in 2013 to avoid the investigation into the Afghan detainees affair.

      Nelson Wiseman, a political science professor at the University of Toronto, wrote of Harper that “no Prime Minister has so abused the power to prorogue”. source

      Trudeau has done it once previously to avoid the WE charity scandal.

    • sbv@sh.itjust.worksOPEnglish
      41·
      2 days ago

      Agreed. The PM already has too much power. Leaving the role with stupid procedural levers is too much for these power hungry assholes to handle.

      • HellsBelle@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
        2·
        2 days ago

        (In 2009) the Governor General (Michaëlle Jean) however, did not grant her prime minister’s (Harper’s) request until after two hours of consultation with various constitutional experts. Upon the end of her tenure as vicereine, Jean revealed to the Canadian Press that the delay was partly to “send a message—and for people to understand that this warranted reflection”. It was also at the same time said by Peter H. Russell, one of those from whom Jean sought advice, that Canadians ought not regard as an automatic rubber stamp the Governor General’s decision to accept Harper’s advice concerning prorogation; Russell disclosed that Jean granted the prorogation on two conditions: parliament would reconvene soon and, when it did, the Cabinet would present a proposed budget, a vote on which is a confidence matter. This, Russell said, set a precedent that would prevent future prime ministers from advising the prorogation of parliament “for any length of time for any reason”. source