First they ignore you,

then they laugh at you,

then they fight you, <-- you are here

then you win.

Only an idiot or an antisemitic asshole uses “Jews” as a stand in for “Israelis”.

Incomplete. The full phrase is actually:

Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo.

(The buffalo from Buffalo that buffalo (i.e. bully) buffaloes from Buffalo, buffalo (i.e., bully) buffaloes from Buffalo.)

Quebec Solidaire is not a provincial NDP party.

Sir, we call that a “nation building project” around here.

Canadian electricity price going up in 3… 2… 1…

TIL that the US before Ford was communist.

Invest in companies making filling materials 🤡

According to internet lore, the man must reciprocate with a wheel of cheese.

encourage the return of Greeks from abroad

Loool, no thanks. Greek employers are notorious tyrants and the Right has destroyed what little worker protections existed. There is no productive economy to speak of just grift and sucking up to nepo babies who pretend they live in a meritocracy. Nobody who doesn’t have to is returning.

What do NYC voters have to say about this?

Wait till you hear how we help Israel do genocide.

And is being accused of “waging a crusade” by the Israeli far right foreign minister. An accusation about which France’s European partners have ostensibly fuck all to say.

An entire article about realistic video and not one mention of porn?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LTJvdGcb7Fs&ab_channel=BroadwayClassics

Why do you attack the OP this way? Do you really think that they are maliciously trying to hide away Greta’s politics?

I agree that the title is too stretched out and I wholeheartedly agree with the rest of your comment.

Do Facebook execs also come in VMax and Gigantomax forms? Like if this guy is a legendary Pokemon, what else does Meta have in its deck?

Also, more seriously, if tech companies can’t be profitable without eminent domaining everything else, maybe they should be eminent domained themselves. Be utilities for the public good or shut the fuck up and play by the rules like all the other kids.

Sure, this is a good example of the bad mixing, because it makes the second part of the clause an example of the first part.

It’s like including smiling at children in the definition of pedophilia. Sure pedophiles will do that, but smiling at kids should not be in itself criminalized.

One can at the same time assert the right of the Jewish people to self determination and at the same time recognize the historical racism that brought it into existence:

Many of the fathers of Zionism themselves described it as colonialism, such as Vladimir Jabotinsky who said “Zionism is a colonization adventure”.[12][13][14] Theodore Herzl, in a 1902 letter to Cecil Rhodes, described the Zionist project as “something colonial”. Previously in 1896 he had spoken of “important experiments in colonization” happening in Palestine.[15][16][17] Max Nordau[18] in 1905 said, “Zionism rejects on principle all colonization on a small scale, and the idea of ‘sneaking’ into Palestine”.[19] Major Zionist organizations central to Israel’s foundation held colonial identity in their names or departments, such as Jewish Colonisation Association, the Jewish Colonial Trust, and The Jewish Agency’s colonization department.[20][21]

I mean, the Canadian people have a right to self determination and at the same time Canada is a racist settler colonial project at its inception. Why is Israel uniquely shielded from this kind of criticism? Recognizing the latter is in no way negating the former.

Some of the stuff in that piece of text is reasonable, other stuff is not. Somehow Israel being uniquely excluded from accusations of racism for example. Or precluding a priori any comparison with past atrocities regardless of what Israeli policy is actually doing.

That’s the whole fucking problem though with IHRA using Israel the state as a unit of analysis. It’s taking good points and mixing them up with incredibly fucked up ones, and is therefore very easy to be instrumentalised by Israeli nationalists to use the former to shield the latter.

The Jerusalem definition on the other hand addresses the problem explicitly.