• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    01 year ago

    you are free to revert any such non-Free firmware

    That is not how granting a right works. Damage of it is already made and no, there is no such thing as rare cases.

    Additionally, the big part of the hardware in H-Node has non-free firmware available in the respective package, also embedded on boot.

    • poVoq
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      I think you somehow maneuvered yourself into a illogical position without realizing it?

      Including some optional firmwares in the install boot-medium infringes zero rights of yours and none of the 4 software freedoms are impacted by this.

      Complain with the hardware vendors for making these firmwares a requirement if you will, but better not buy such hardware in the first place. But Debian absolutely did the right thing here to their current and future users by optionally including these non-free firmwares regardless of what some ideological demagogues say.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        0
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Including some optional firmwares in the install boot-medium infringes zero rights of yours and none of the 4 software freedoms are impacted by this.

        Loading at boot time the firmware involves execution in applied hardware of software I have no power in.

        Complain with the hardware vendors for making these firmwares a requirement if you will, but better not buy such hardware in the first place.

        Doesn’t exclude that Debian did the worse thing. Options existed as I introduced before, and very obvious ones. If they needed help, I have no issues to provide it.

        • poVoq
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          Only if you run hardware that requires it. That is not the fault of Debian and making this hardware available for use is better than not doing it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            poVoq, I already explained how that works. Almost all the hardware can load it and it is done automatically, not based on an H-Node list to know if it works without it or not, which could be an option. If it is available, will be loaded and executed with compatible hardware.

            Debian doesn’t have the fault for what the hardware vendors do, but has the fault for enforcing the situation when other options existed.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Rewording this:

              A proposal I would accept is loading based in H-Node list to know if it works with it or not (a similar thing has been done with Linux-Libre but for enforcing not loading it). I would accept that, and I would give the option at boot time itself.

            • poVoq
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              The majority of the hardware either requires it, or it doesn’t. It is the rare edge case that it can also work in a degraded mode using only Free software, and you are free to not use such firmwares on your system after installing Debian on it. But yes in the 30 minutes or so that you use the installer it will be auto-loaded helping a lot of users actually install an running system and inflicting no damage to you at all.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I think you don’t understand what is even an inalienable interest, a right and which are the rights violated here. Yes, there is damage, in freedom.

                There is no rare thing for hardware in H-Node working. I would like you to check it and availability. It is less, but it is not a rare case.

                The option may exists based on such a list and any of the both sides would be affected negatively. In the same way it saves you time or impossibility in some cases, it would prevent my rights being harmed and save my time yet.

                It would involve an initial effort in development, that is right. This would also help more for these rights that failing in the way is doing right now.

                • poVoq
                  link
                  fedilink
                  2
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  I disagree that it removes any Freedom from you, but even if that were the case the damage would be so minuscule compared to the massive improvement for others that literally could not even install Debian on their system before.

                  And sure, there might be possible complicated work-arounds, but this issue has existed for years and no one bothered to implement them. So finally the silent majority took the right step to make this minimal impact change, and now the ball is really back with those complaining about this change. I am sure Debian will not be opposed to include some sort of selection in the boot process if someone would actually implement it, but that is far from trivial to do.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        01 year ago

        regardless of what some ideological demagogues say

        I never pointed to you with ad hominems. Refrain to do that next time.

        It is not my fault that you think that I am backed or not by some people like that, nor I should be the victim for such a case.