The current title seems to be unpopular. Do you have any suggestions for a better title?

I need to write down the number of anal wrinkles on a sticky note and stick it to my computer monitor for analprint sign-in!

I think it’s the most (generally) well-known E2EE cloud storage. There are several cloud storage services that offer better security/privacy if you simply want to upload your data, but I think it’s a great service for distributing files to an unspecified number of people on the Internet.

Cookies are disabled if you reject them, and there is no tracker. This site is great.

Oh, right. I’m sorry. My mistake.

Good article.

I think the reason this post is getting downvoted is probably because the question doesn’t make sense. “Self-hosting” simply means “Doing self-host”, and the definition of “safe” in this question is unclear.

New windows? Not New tab?

There is no question that there is room for improvement in the recommendation algorithm, but the claim that Big Tech is being (unfairly) harsh on conservative information is worth considering. However, this is partly because conservative information on the Internet contains a lot of wrong information.

Whenever I see people in the customer service industry complaining on the Internet, I always wonder why they direct their frustration at the customers and not at the system of the institution where they are employed.

You should have at least posted it on /c/linuxmint.

Is this a request rather than news?

Oh, God.

Github is a repository for open source code, not the concept of open source itself. As I have said many times before, please do not confuse “open source” with “open source software”.

No. Open source is safer than closed source. The correct is: “Open source software is not necessarily safer than closed source software.” On such topics, we need to make a clear distinction between open source/closed source and open source software/closed source software.

Every system has its advantages and disadvantages. It is the same whether it is centralized, federated, or P2P.

Lemmy currently supports only inter-Lemmy federations, and the Lemmy developers are thinking of federating with Fediverse in the future, but that will be a long way off. So, it is not possible. At least not yet.

Seriously? That’s not the point of my story. I’m not here to discuss “how to protect Reddit from spammers.”

You still need to considers the costs of accepting said users though, even if you don’t likes it being done in such manners.

Yes. It is important to think about costs. But the problem is that we are not the management team of Reddit. They are the ones who have to think about costs, and they are the ones who have the final say. I don’t think, on several grounds, that this request for an end to the depressing restrictions on VPN users is something that can be swept under the rug by cost issues. I will discuss this later.

Just think of anti-fraud measures which denying VPNs are apart of. If you are a small firm and you need to protect your business aren’t you inclined to do the same exact measures and tell your FraudLabsPro to ignore/caution against VPN orders?

As you know, Reddit inc. is not a small company, and as Dessalines says, they have the money. And Reddit is a huge platform. As a link aggregation service, it has a huge market share and attracts a lot of information and people. With a huge platform comes responsibility for the public good. It is not good for such a company to stay in a position of devaluing a few users.

I understand that VPN restrictions are effective in preventing spam and attacks. However, isn’t there a better way? I don’t know. We have no way of knowing. There is an overwhelming difference in the information that companies and users can know. Maybe there is a better solution than VPN restrictions. But there is no way to know that. Neither can I, and neither can you. After all, there’s no reason for users to shy away from corporate pocketbooks. We don’t know anything about it.

I’ve written a lot about it, but I don’t really want Reddit to do anything. I don’t use Reddit, Reddit is not open source, the site is too heavy, and … I don’t think it matters.

My point is that there is no need for users’ complaints (requests) to be silenced by a third party that has nothing to do with the company, for the benefit of the company. It hinders fair reviews, makes companies (whatever their policies are) look like mere money collectors, and hurts the service in the long run.

The metaverse is a very wonderful thing. I would like to see it built on a decentralized, open system.And Facebook won’t do that with the metaverse.